NVIDIA
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4090
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
RTX 4090
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 6000 Ada and RTX 4090 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 6000 Ada outperforms RTX 4090 by ~4% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 6000 Ada
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL
Reasons to consider RTX 4090
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8688
9665
2839
100100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 15–20of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4090
131 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86
88Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68
70Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66
67Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96Better
65
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
75Better
72
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TFLOPSBetter
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory bus
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process node
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
Upscaling—
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Power connector—
Thickness—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Recommended PSU—
Length—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Transistor count—
Max monitors—
Max resolution—
USB Type-C—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 6000 Ada and RTX 4090 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 6000 AdaRTX 4090
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
365 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
252 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
188 FPS
4K Ultra
—
95 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090365 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090252 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090188 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 409095 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090230 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090205 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090142 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 409068 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090284 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090194 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090172 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090131 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090187 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090157 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 4090126 FPSRTX 6000 Ada—RTX 409074 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10086882%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10088891%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10090911%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100966539%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10092931%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10092931%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10090911%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10094951%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10090922%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—12.2
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling—DLSS 3
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date20222022
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—76300 million
Die size—609 mm²
Shader units / cores—16384
Base clock—2235 MHz
Boost clock—2520 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—304 mm
Thickness—Triple-slot
Recommended PSU—850 W
Power connector—16 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C—No
Max monitors—4
Max resolution—7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM48 GBBetter24 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR6X
Memory bus384-bit384 bit
TFLOPS91.1Better82.58
Other comparisons
Arc B580Intel
RX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 49
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 6000 Ada or RTX 4090?+
RTX 6000 Ada has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4090 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 6000 Ada is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 6000 Ada is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 6000 Ada offers more overall performance, while RTX 6000 Ada offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 6000 Ada is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4090 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 6000 Ada leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 6000 Ada can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 6000 Ada is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4090 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4090 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 6000 Ada if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.