NVIDIA
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs GeForce GTS 260M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 260M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A5000 and GeForce GTS 260M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX A5000 outperforms GeForce GTS 260M by ~90% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+90%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA RTX A5000 (~90%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX A5000
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 260M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8630
100100
4954
10056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 2–7of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTS 260M
125 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
80Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
Memory bandwidth—
Max monitors—
Max resolution—
USB Type-C—
Recommended PSU—
Length—
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Launch price——
Shader units / cores—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Thickness—
Transistor count—
Power connector—
Upscaling—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX A5000 and GeForce GTS 260M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX A5000GeForce GTS 260M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
58 FPS
4K Ultra
—
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M153 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M106 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M58 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M99 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M84 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M42 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M125 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M79 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M53 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M81 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M66 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M38 FPSRTX A5000—GeForce GTS 260M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100863097%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100883293%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100903783%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001005656%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100924275%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100924079%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100903783%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100944472%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100903881%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—10.1
VulkanVulkan 1.3Not supported
OpenGL—3.3
Upscaling—Not supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmpereTesla
Process node8 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20212009
Device classProfMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—727 million
Die size—144 mm²
Shader units / cores—96
Base clock—550 MHz
Boost clock—550 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length—OEM dependent
Thickness—OEM dependent
Recommended PSU—OEM dependent
Power connector—Integrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-C—OEM dependent
Max monitors—OEM dependent
Max resolution—OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GBBetter0.5 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR3 / DDR3
Memory bus384-bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS27.8Better0.257
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 48
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX A5000 or GeForce GTS 260M?+
RTX A5000 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce GTS 260M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX A5000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX A5000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX A5000 offers more overall performance, while RTX A5000 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX A5000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce GTS 260M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX A5000 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX A5000 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX A5000 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce GTS 260M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce GTS 260M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX A5000 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.