NVIDIA
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs Radeon R9 Nano
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R9 Nano
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A5000 and R9 Nano across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX A5000 outperforms R9 Nano by ~48% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+48%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA RTX A5000 (~48%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX A5000
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL
Reasons to consider R9 Nano
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8641
10078
49100
10050
Graphics card ranking
Positions 2–7of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
NVIDIA RTX A5000
78 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
78
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
80Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
DirectX—
OpenGL—
Power consumption—
Power connector—
Thickness—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores—
Clock speed—
Base clock—
Boost clock—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Recommended PSU—
Length—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Transistor count—
Max monitors—
Max resolution—
USB Type-C—
Upscaling—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX A5000 and R9 Nano across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX A5000R9 Nano
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
188 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
132 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
87 FPS
4K Ultra
—
35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX A5000—R9 Nano188 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano132 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano87 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano35 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX A5000—R9 Nano122 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano105 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano63 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano23 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX A5000—R9 Nano153 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano99 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano78 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano51 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX A5000—R9 Nano99 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano83 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano56 FPSRTX A5000—R9 Nano24 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100864171%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100884173%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100904469%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001005067%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007825%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100924569%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100924569%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100904469%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100944669%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100904469%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX—12.0
VulkanVulkan 1.31.2
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling—Not supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 3.0
Process node8 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20212015
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—8900 million
Die size—596 mm²
Shader units / cores—4096
Base clock—1000 MHz
Boost clock—1000 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3x16
Length—154 mm
Thickness—Dual-slot
Recommended PSU—450 W
Power connector—8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMINoHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-C—No
Max monitors—4
Max resolution—4096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GBBetter4 GB HBM
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCHBM
Memory bus384-bit4096 bitBetter
TFLOPS27.8Better8.192
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 49
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX A5000 or R9 Nano?+
RTX A5000 has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 Nano offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX A5000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX A5000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX A5000 offers more overall performance, while RTX A5000 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX A5000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 Nano is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX A5000 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX A5000 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX A5000 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R9 Nano is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R9 Nano is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX A5000 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.