NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs Intel Arc A770

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A6000 and Arc A770 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX A6000 outperforms Arc A770 by ~19% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+19%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: NVIDIA RTX A6000 (~19%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX A6000

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL

Reasons to consider Arc A770

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
8655
Efficiency
9681
Price / performance
3494
Memory capacity
10088
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 13–18of 30
RTX A6000#15position in the GPU ranking
Arc A770not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

NVIDIA RTX A6000

122 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX A6000Arc A770
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
86Better
55
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
68Better
46
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
66Better
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
96Better
81
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
64

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX A6000Arc A770
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
DirectX
OpenGL
Power consumption
Power connector
Memory cache
Upscaling
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clock
Memory frequency
Memory bandwidth
Thickness
Launch price
Shader units / cores
Recommended PSU
Die size
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
Length
USB Type-C

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX A6000 and Arc A770 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX A6000Arc A770
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
228 FPS
1080p Ultra
160 FPS
1440p Ultra
125 FPS
4K Ultra
62 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX A6000Arc A770228 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770160 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770125 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77062 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX A6000Arc A770147 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770127 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77090 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77042 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX A6000Arc A770186 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770120 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770112 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77091 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX A6000Arc A770120 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770101 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77081 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77042 FPS
Average FPSRTX A6000Arc A770170 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770127 FPSRTX A6000Arc A770102 FPSRTX A6000Arc A77059 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX A6000Arc A770Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100865544%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100886432%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100906434%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001008813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100968117%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX A6000Arc A770Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100927027%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100926830%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100906434%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100947325%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100906532%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
DirectX12.2
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL4.6
UpscalingXeSS
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20202022
Device classProfDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
Transistor count21700 million
Die size406 mm²
Shader units / cores4096
Base clock2100 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W
Power connector8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
HDMINoHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNo
Max monitors4
Max resolution7680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX A6000Arc A770
VRAM48 GBBetter16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6 ECCGDDR6
Memory bus384-bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS38.7Better19.66

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX A600076
Device BArc A77064
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
16
Specifications
0 / 49

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (1)
  1. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX A6000 or Arc A770?

RTX A6000 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX A6000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX A6000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX A6000 offers more overall performance, while RTX A6000 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX A6000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX A6000 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX A6000 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX A6000 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX A6000 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.