NVIDIA
Titan RTX vs GeForce MX230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Titan RTX and GeForce MX230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Titan RTX outperforms GeForce MX230 by ~68% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+68%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Titan RTX (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Titan RTX
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider GeForce MX230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5231
62100
6454
10056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 173–178of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Titan RTX
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
62
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Thickness
Launch price—
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Release date
Memory type
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
Compute API
Clock speedBetter
VRAMBetter
Power connector
Architecture
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Titan RTX and GeForce MX230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Titan RTXGeForce MX230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
156 FPS
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
118 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
59 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Titan RTX216 FPSGeForce MX230156 FPSTitan RTX152 FPSGeForce MX230110 FPSTitan RTX118 FPSGeForce MX23059 FPSTitan RTX59 FPSGeForce MX23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Titan RTX139 FPSGeForce MX230101 FPSTitan RTX120 FPSGeForce MX23087 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSGeForce MX23043 FPSTitan RTX39 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Titan RTX176 FPSGeForce MX230127 FPSTitan RTX114 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSTitan RTX106 FPSGeForce MX23053 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSGeForce MX23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyTitan RTX114 FPSGeForce MX23082 FPSTitan RTX95 FPSGeForce MX23069 FPSTitan RTX77 FPSGeForce MX23038 FPSTitan RTX40 FPSGeForce MX23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100523151%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100603845%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100653852%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001005656%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006210047%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100744255%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100714154%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100653852%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100784554%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100663854%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringPascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20182019
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count18600 millionBetter1800 million
Die size754 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better256
Base clock1350 MHz1519 MHzBetter
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter1531 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors5OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS16.31Better0.784
Other comparisons
RX 5500AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Titan RTX or GeForce MX230?+
Titan RTX has the higher overall gaming score, while Titan RTX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Titan RTX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Titan RTX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Titan RTX offers more overall performance, while Titan RTX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Titan RTX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Titan RTX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Titan RTX leads in combined 1440p performance. Titan RTX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Titan RTX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Titan RTX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.