NVIDIA
Titan RTX vs Mobility Radeon 9550
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon 9550
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Titan RTX and Mobility Radeon 9550 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Titan RTX outperforms Mobility Radeon 9550 by ~86% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+86%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Titan RTX (~63%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Titan RTX
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon 9550
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
ATIPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5228
6464
1002
Graphics card ranking
Positions 173–178of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Titan RTX
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
62Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
32
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Thickness
Launch price—
USB Type-C
Power consumption—
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Release date
Memory type
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
Compute API
Clock speedBetter
VRAMBetter
Power connector
Architecture
Shader units / cores
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Titan RTX and Mobility Radeon 9550 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Titan RTXMobility Radeon 9550
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
143 FPS
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
100 FPS
1440p Ultra
118 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
59 FPS
19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Titan RTX216 FPSMobility Radeon 9550143 FPSTitan RTX152 FPSMobility Radeon 9550100 FPSTitan RTX118 FPSMobility Radeon 955054 FPSTitan RTX59 FPSMobility Radeon 955019 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Titan RTX139 FPSMobility Radeon 955092 FPSTitan RTX120 FPSMobility Radeon 955079 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSMobility Radeon 955039 FPSTitan RTX39 FPSMobility Radeon 955013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Titan RTX176 FPSMobility Radeon 9550116 FPSTitan RTX114 FPSMobility Radeon 955075 FPSTitan RTX106 FPSMobility Radeon 955048 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSMobility Radeon 955029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyTitan RTX114 FPSMobility Radeon 955075 FPSTitan RTX95 FPSMobility Radeon 955063 FPSTitan RTX77 FPSMobility Radeon 955035 FPSTitan RTX40 FPSMobility Radeon 955013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100522860%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100602196%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1006521102%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001002192%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100620200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 1007416129%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 1007118119%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 1006521102%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007814139%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 1006620107%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.29.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringRadeon R300/R400
Process node12 nmBetter130 nm
Release date20182004
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count18600 millionBetter76 million
Die size754 mm²92 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Not publicly specified
Base clock1350 MHzBetter250 MHz
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter250 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors5OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR6Better0.064 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR6DDR / DDR2
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS16.31Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Titan RTX or Mobility Radeon 9550?+
Titan RTX has the higher overall gaming score, while Titan RTX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Titan RTX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Titan RTX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Titan RTX offers more overall performance, while Titan RTX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Titan RTX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Titan RTX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Titan RTX leads in combined 1440p performance. Titan RTX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Titan RTX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Titan RTX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Titan RTX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Titan RTX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.