NVIDIA
Titan RTX vs Radeon R9 285
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R9 285
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Titan RTX and R9 285 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Titan RTX outperforms R9 285 by ~53% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+53%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Titan RTX (~13%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Titan RTX
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider R9 285
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5234
6260
64100
10056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 173–178of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Titan RTX
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R9 285
Price $50.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
62Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
46
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Thickness
Launch priceBetter
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Release date
Memory type
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
Compute API
Clock speedBetter
VRAMBetter
Power connector
Architecture
Shader units / coresBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Titan RTX and R9 285 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Titan RTXR9 285
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
175 FPS
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
120 FPS
1440p Ultra
118 FPS
65 FPS
4K Ultra
59 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Titan RTX216 FPSR9 285175 FPSTitan RTX152 FPSR9 285120 FPSTitan RTX118 FPSR9 28565 FPSTitan RTX59 FPSR9 28524 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Titan RTX139 FPSR9 285113 FPSTitan RTX120 FPSR9 28595 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSR9 28547 FPSTitan RTX39 FPSR9 28516 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Titan RTX176 FPSR9 285142 FPSTitan RTX114 FPSR9 28590 FPSTitan RTX106 FPSR9 28558 FPSTitan RTX86 FPSR9 28535 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyTitan RTX114 FPSR9 28592 FPSTitan RTX95 FPSR9 28575 FPSTitan RTX77 FPSR9 28542 FPSTitan RTX40 FPSR9 28516 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100603747%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100654048%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001005656%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10062603%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100744451%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100714349%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100654048%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100784652%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664049%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringGCN 3.0
Process node12 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20182014
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count18600 millionBetter5000 million
Die size754 mm²366 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better1792
Base clock1350 MHzBetter918 MHz
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter918 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm221 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W450 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors54
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus384 bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS16.31Better3.29
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Titan RTX or R9 285?+
Titan RTX has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 285 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Titan RTX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Titan RTX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Titan RTX offers more overall performance, while Titan RTX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Titan RTX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 285 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Titan RTX leads in combined 1440p performance. Titan RTX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Titan RTX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R9 285 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R9 285 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Titan RTX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.