NVIDIA
TITAN Xp vs Radeon HD 6770
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6770
Aggregate performance score
We've compared TITAN Xp and HD 6770 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗TITAN Xp outperforms HD 6770 by ~61% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+61%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: TITAN Xp (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider TITAN Xp
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 6770
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5031
6796
81100
8056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 70–75of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 6770
120 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon HD 6770
Price $18.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
96Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
LengthBetter
Thickness
Memory type
DisplayPort
HDMI
USB Type-C
Device class
Power connector
Max monitors
Max resolution
Release date
Architecture
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Memory cache
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares TITAN Xp and HD 6770 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
TITAN XpHD 6770
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
204 FPS
158 FPS
1080p Ultra
144 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
112 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
55 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2TITAN Xp204 FPSHD 6770158 FPSTITAN Xp144 FPSHD 6770110 FPSTITAN Xp112 FPSHD 677060 FPSTITAN Xp55 FPSHD 677021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077TITAN Xp132 FPSHD 6770102 FPSTITAN Xp114 FPSHD 677087 FPSTITAN Xp81 FPSHD 677044 FPSTITAN Xp37 FPSHD 677014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5TITAN Xp166 FPSHD 6770129 FPSTITAN Xp108 FPSHD 677082 FPSTITAN Xp100 FPSHD 677054 FPSTITAN Xp82 FPSHD 677031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyTITAN Xp108 FPSHD 677083 FPSTITAN Xp90 FPSHD 677069 FPSTITAN Xp72 FPSHD 677039 FPSTITAN Xp38 FPSHD 677014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503147%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100553447%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100583842%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100805635%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100679636%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100634240%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100624141%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100583842%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100664538%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100593843%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.111.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascalTeraScale 2
Process node16 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20162011
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count11800 millionBetter1040 million
Die size471 mm²166 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3840Better800
Base clock1480 MHzBetter850 MHz
Boost clock1582 MHzBetter850 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mm198 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W300 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4amini-DisplayPort 1.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors45
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR5XBetter1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Memory bus384 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS12.15Better1.36
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: TITAN Xp or HD 6770?+
TITAN Xp has the higher overall gaming score, while HD 6770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
TITAN Xp is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
TITAN Xp is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
TITAN Xp offers more overall performance, while TITAN Xp offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
TITAN Xp is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
HD 6770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
TITAN Xp leads in combined 1440p performance. TITAN Xp can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
TITAN Xp is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to TITAN Xp if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.