AMD
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce MX330
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX330
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R5 230 and GeForce MX330 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R5 230 outperforms GeForce MX330 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R5 230 (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R5 230
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX330
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3131
100100
10054
4356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 285–290of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R5 230
87 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power consumptionBetter
Device class
Vulkan
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
HDMI
DisplayPort
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R5 230 and GeForce MX330 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R5 230GeForce MX330
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R5 230155 FPSGeForce MX330157 FPSR5 230109 FPSGeForce MX330110 FPSR5 23058 FPSGeForce MX33059 FPSR5 23021 FPSGeForce MX33021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R5 230100 FPSGeForce MX330101 FPSR5 23086 FPSGeForce MX33087 FPSR5 23042 FPSGeForce MX33043 FPSR5 23014 FPSGeForce MX33014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R5 230126 FPSGeForce MX330128 FPSR5 23082 FPSGeForce MX33083 FPSR5 23052 FPSGeForce MX33053 FPSR5 23031 FPSGeForce MX33031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR5 23082 FPSGeForce MX33083 FPSR5 23068 FPSGeForce MX33069 FPSR5 23038 FPSGeForce MX33038 FPSR5 23014 FPSGeForce MX33015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031310%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100435626%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100364215%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100364113%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100343811%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.012.1
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.44.6
UpscalingNot supportedNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeraScale 2Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node40 nm14 nmBetter
Release date20142020
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count370 million1800 millionBetter
Die size67 mm²Better74 mm²
Shader units / cores160384Better
Base clock625 MHz1531 MHzBetter
Boost clock625 MHz1594 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length168 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.3aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution2560 × 1600Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB DDR32 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeDDR3GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
TFLOPS0.21.224Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R5 230 or GeForce MX330?+
R5 230 has the higher overall gaming score, while R5 230 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX330 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX330 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R5 230 offers more overall performance, while R5 230 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX330 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R5 230 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R5 230 leads in combined 1440p performance. R5 230 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R5 230 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX330 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX330 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R5 230 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.