AMD
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce 410M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 410M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R7 240 and GeForce 410M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R7 240 outperforms GeForce 410M by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R7 240 (~24%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R7 240
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce 410M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3130
100100
10054
4343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 155–160of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 410M
98 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power connector
Release date
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
DisplayPort
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R7 240 and GeForce 410M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R7 240GeForce 410M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
150 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
59 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R7 240155 FPSGeForce 410M150 FPSR7 240109 FPSGeForce 410M106 FPSR7 24059 FPSGeForce 410M57 FPSR7 24021 FPSGeForce 410M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R7 240100 FPSGeForce 410M97 FPSR7 24086 FPSGeForce 410M84 FPSR7 24043 FPSGeForce 410M41 FPSR7 24014 FPSGeForce 410M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R7 240126 FPSGeForce 410M123 FPSR7 24082 FPSGeForce 410M79 FPSR7 24053 FPSGeForce 410M51 FPSR7 24031 FPSGeForce 410M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR7 24082 FPSGeForce 410M79 FPSR7 24068 FPSGeForce 410M66 FPSR7 24038 FPSGeForce 410M37 FPSR7 24014 FPSGeForce 410M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031303%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10032306%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10036353%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10038373%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10035343%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.111.0
Vulkan1.2Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Fermi
Process node28 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20132011
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count950 millionBetter292 million
Die size77 mm²Better79 mm²
Shader units / cores320Better48
Base clock780 MHzBetter574 MHz
Boost clock780 MHzBetter574 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU200 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution4096 × 2160Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR3Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS0.448Better0.11
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R7 240 or GeForce 410M?+
R7 240 has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 240 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 410M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 410M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R7 240 offers more overall performance, while R7 240 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 410M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R7 240 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R7 240 leads in combined 1440p performance. R7 240 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R7 240 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 410M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 410M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R7 240 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.