AMD
Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 680
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 680
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R7 360 and GTX 680 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 680 outperforms R7 360 by ~9% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+9%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R7 360 (~30%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R7 360
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 680
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3235
10060
10069
5656
Graphics card ranking
Positions 157–162of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 680
104 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon R7 360
Price $26.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
35Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
32Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
29Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Boost clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process node
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R7 360 and GTX 680 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R7 360GTX 680
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
160 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
67 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R7 360160 FPSGTX 680178 FPSR7 360111 FPSGTX 680122 FPSR7 36061 FPSGTX 68067 FPSR7 36021 FPSGTX 68024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R7 360104 FPSGTX 680115 FPSR7 36088 FPSGTX 68096 FPSR7 36044 FPSGTX 68048 FPSR7 36014 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R7 360131 FPSGTX 680145 FPSR7 36083 FPSGTX 68091 FPSR7 36055 FPSGTX 68060 FPSR7 36032 FPSGTX 68035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR7 36085 FPSGTX 68094 FPSR7 36070 FPSGTX 68076 FPSR7 36040 FPSGTX 68043 FPSR7 36015 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032359%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10043442%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10041435%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10045462%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10039415%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.011.0
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Kepler
Process node28 nm28 nm
Release date20152012
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2080 million3540 millionBetter
Die size160 mm²Better294 mm²
Shader units / cores7681536Better
Base clock1050 MHzBetter1006 MHz
Boost clock1050 MHz1058 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length165 mmBetter256 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter450 W
Power connector6 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aHDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2DisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution4096 × 21604096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR52 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS1.6133.25Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R7 360 or GTX 680?+
R7 360 has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 360 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 680 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 680 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R7 360 offers more overall performance, while R7 360 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 680 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R7 360 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R7 360 leads in combined 1440p performance. R7 360 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R7 360 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R7 360 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R7 360 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R7 360 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.