AMD
Radeon R7 360 vs Mobility Radeon 9700
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
ATI
Mobility Radeon 9700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R7 360 and Mobility Radeon 9700 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R7 360 outperforms Mobility Radeon 9700 by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R7 360 (~58%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R7 360
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider Mobility Radeon 9700
- Recorded feature support: Not supported · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3229
10064
562
Graphics card ranking
Positions 157–162of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Mobility Radeon 9700
103 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
ArchitectureBetter
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Boost clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R7 360 and Mobility Radeon 9700 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R7 360Mobility Radeon 9700
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
160 FPS
144 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
61 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R7 360160 FPSMobility Radeon 9700144 FPSR7 360111 FPSMobility Radeon 9700101 FPSR7 36061 FPSMobility Radeon 970054 FPSR7 36021 FPSMobility Radeon 970020 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R7 360104 FPSMobility Radeon 970093 FPSR7 36088 FPSMobility Radeon 970080 FPSR7 36044 FPSMobility Radeon 970039 FPSR7 36014 FPSMobility Radeon 970013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R7 360131 FPSMobility Radeon 9700117 FPSR7 36083 FPSMobility Radeon 970076 FPSR7 36055 FPSMobility Radeon 970049 FPSR7 36032 FPSMobility Radeon 970029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR7 36085 FPSMobility Radeon 970076 FPSR7 36070 FPSMobility Radeon 970063 FPSR7 36040 FPSMobility Radeon 970035 FPSR7 36015 FPSMobility Radeon 970013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100322910%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100362344%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100562186%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100431787%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100411878%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1004514105%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100392160%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.09.0
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1Not supported
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Radeon R300/R400Better
Process node28 nmBetter130 nm
Release date20152004
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2080 millionBetter76 million
Die size160 mm²92 mm²Better
Shader units / cores768Not publicly specified
Base clock1050 MHzBetter450 MHz
Boost clock1050 MHzBetter450 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16AGP 8x
Length165 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU300 WOEM dependent
Power connector6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution4096 × 2160OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5Better0.064 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR5DDR / DDR2
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS1.613Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R7 360 or Mobility Radeon 9700?+
R7 360 has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 360 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
R7 360 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
R7 360 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R7 360 offers more overall performance, while R7 360 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
R7 360 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R7 360 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R7 360 leads in combined 1440p performance. R7 360 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R7 360 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R7 360 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R7 360 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R7 360 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.