AMD
Radeon R7 370 vs GeForce GT 430
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GT 430
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R7 370 and GT 430 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R7 370 outperforms GT 430 by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R7 370 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R7 370
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GT 430
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3431
100100
100100
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 115–120of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R7 370
160 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
34Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
31Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R7 370 and GT 430 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R7 370GT 430
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
174 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
119 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
65 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
24 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R7 370174 FPSGT 430154 FPSR7 370119 FPSGT 430108 FPSR7 37065 FPSGT 43058 FPSR7 37024 FPSGT 43021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R7 370113 FPSGT 430100 FPSR7 37094 FPSGT 43086 FPSR7 37047 FPSGT 43042 FPSR7 37016 FPSGT 43014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R7 370142 FPSGT 430126 FPSR7 37089 FPSGT 43081 FPSR7 37058 FPSGT 43053 FPSR7 37035 FPSGT 43031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR7 37092 FPSGT 43081 FPSR7 37075 FPSGT 43068 FPSR7 37042 FPSGT 43038 FPSR7 37016 FPSGT 43014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10034319%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100373214%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100403416%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100433618%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100403416%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100463819%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100403513%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX11.111.0
Vulkan1.2Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.2OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 1.0Fermi
Process node28 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20152010
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2800 millionBetter585 million
Die size212 mm²116 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1024Better96
Base clock925 MHzBetter700 MHz
Boost clock975 MHzBetter700 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length152 mm145 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU300 W200 WBetter
Power connector6 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aHDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2Board dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution4096 × 21602560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR5Better1 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS1.997Better0.269
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R7 370 or GT 430?+
R7 370 has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 370 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 430 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 430 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R7 370 offers more overall performance, while R7 370 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 430 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R7 370 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R7 370 leads in combined 1440p performance. R7 370 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R7 370 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 430 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 430 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R7 370 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.