AMD
Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce MX570
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R9 280X and GeForce MX570 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗R9 280X outperforms GeForce MX570 by ~13% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+13%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R9 280X (~5%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R9 280X
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX570
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3632
48100
10055
5660
Graphics card ranking
Positions 253–258of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX570
77 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
48
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
45Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Vulkan
OpenGL
DirectX
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R9 280X and GeForce MX570 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R9 280XGeForce MX570
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
175 FPS
163 FPS
1080p Ultra
123 FPS
115 FPS
1440p Ultra
74 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
26 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R9 280X175 FPSGeForce MX570163 FPSR9 280X123 FPSGeForce MX570115 FPSR9 280X74 FPSGeForce MX57062 FPSR9 280X26 FPSGeForce MX57022 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R9 280X113 FPSGeForce MX570105 FPSR9 280X97 FPSGeForce MX57091 FPSR9 280X54 FPSGeForce MX57045 FPSR9 280X17 FPSGeForce MX57015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R9 280X142 FPSGeForce MX570133 FPSR9 280X92 FPSGeForce MX57086 FPSR9 280X67 FPSGeForce MX57056 FPSR9 280X38 FPSGeForce MX57033 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR9 280X92 FPSGeForce MX57086 FPSR9 280X77 FPSGeForce MX57072 FPSR9 280X48 FPSGeForce MX57040 FPSR9 280X17 FPSGeForce MX57015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10039375%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10042405%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1004810070%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044432%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10042405%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10047482%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 2.0Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node28 nm8 nmBetter
Release date20132021
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2080 million8700 millionBetter
Die size160 mm²Better200 mm²
Shader units / cores8962048Better
Base clock1000 MHzBetter832 MHz
Boost clock1000 MHz1155 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortBoard dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitorsVaries by boardOEM dependent
Max resolutionVaries by boardDepends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM3 GB GDDR5Better2 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS1.7924.731Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R9 280X or GeForce MX570?+
R9 280X has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 280X offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX570 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX570 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R9 280X offers more overall performance, while R9 280X offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX570 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 280X is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R9 280X leads in combined 1440p performance. R9 280X can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R9 280X is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R9 280X if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.