AMD
Radeon R9 380X vs GeForce MX450
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX450
Aggregate performance score
We've compared R9 380X and GeForce MX450 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce MX450 outperforms R9 380X by ~9% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+9%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon R9 380X (~18%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider R9 380X
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce MX450
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
3538
10065
Graphics card ranking
Positions 231–236of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon R9 380X
71 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
35
38Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
34Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
29
31Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
61Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
47Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Thickness
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process node—
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares R9 380X and GeForce MX450 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
R9 380XGeForce MX450
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
178 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
122 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
66 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
24 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2R9 380X178 FPSGeForce MX450157 FPSR9 380X122 FPSGeForce MX450111 FPSR9 380X66 FPSGeForce MX45086 FPSR9 380X24 FPSGeForce MX45043 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077R9 380X115 FPSGeForce MX450102 FPSR9 380X96 FPSGeForce MX45088 FPSR9 380X48 FPSGeForce MX45062 FPSR9 380X16 FPSGeForce MX45029 FPS
Forza Horizon 5R9 380X145 FPSGeForce MX450128 FPSR9 380X91 FPSGeForce MX45083 FPSR9 380X60 FPSGeForce MX45077 FPSR9 380X35 FPSGeForce MX45063 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyR9 380X94 FPSGeForce MX45083 FPSR9 380X76 FPSGeForce MX45069 FPSR9 380X43 FPSGeForce MX45056 FPSR9 380X16 FPSGeForce MX45029 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10035388%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100560200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100610200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100443815%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100433812%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100463819%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10041388%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node28 nm—
Release date20152017
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count5000 millionNot publicly specified
Die size366 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2048Not publicly specified
Base clock970 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock970 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16OEM platform dependent
Length221 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector6+6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 1.4aOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.2OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution4096 × 2160OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR5OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS3.973OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: R9 380X or GeForce MX450?+
R9 380X has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 380X offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX450 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX450 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
R9 380X offers more overall performance, while R9 380X offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX450 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R9 380X is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
R9 380X leads in combined 1440p performance. R9 380X can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
R9 380X is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R9 380X is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R9 380X is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to R9 380X if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.