AMD
Radeon 540 vs GeForce GTS 150M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 540 and GeForce GTS 150M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon 540 outperforms GeForce GTS 150M by ~3% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 540 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon 540
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 150M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3130
100100
5454
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 243–248of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 540
168 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory frequencyBetter
DisplayPort
Release date
HDMI
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon 540 and GeForce GTS 150M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon 540GeForce GTS 150M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
147 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
104 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon 540155 FPSGeForce GTS 150M147 FPSRadeon 540109 FPSGeForce GTS 150M104 FPSRadeon 54058 FPSGeForce GTS 150M58 FPSRadeon 54021 FPSGeForce GTS 150M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon 540100 FPSGeForce GTS 150M95 FPSRadeon 54086 FPSGeForce GTS 150M82 FPSRadeon 54042 FPSGeForce GTS 150M42 FPSRadeon 54014 FPSGeForce GTS 150M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon 540126 FPSGeForce GTS 150M120 FPSRadeon 54081 FPSGeForce GTS 150M78 FPSRadeon 54052 FPSGeForce GTS 150M52 FPSRadeon 54031 FPSGeForce GTS 150M32 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon 54081 FPSGeForce GTS 150M78 FPSRadeon 54068 FPSGeForce GTS 150M65 FPSRadeon 54038 FPSGeForce GTS 150M38 FPSRadeon 54014 FPSGeForce GTS 150M15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10031303%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100362922%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100423615%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100413516%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100453720%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.010.0
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisTesla
Process node14 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20172009
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2200 millionBetter505 million
Die size103 mm²Better240 mm²
Shader units / cores384Better64
Base clock1183 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1183 MHzBetter400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors2OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR51 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3 / DDR3
Memory bus32 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.908Better0.128
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon 540 or GeForce GTS 150M?+
Radeon 540 has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon 540 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce GTS 150M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce GTS 150M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon 540 offers more overall performance, while Radeon 540 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce GTS 150M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon 540 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon 540 leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon 540 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon 540 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce GTS 150M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce GTS 150M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon 540 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.