AMD
Radeon 540X vs GeForce Go 7300
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce Go 7300
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon 540X and GeForce Go 7300 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon 540X outperforms GeForce Go 7300 by ~11% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon 540X (~34%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon 540X
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider GeForce Go 7300
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3128
5464
5643
Graphics card ranking
Positions 288–293of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce Go 7300
128 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
32
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / cores
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Release date
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon 540X and GeForce Go 7300 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon 540XGeForce Go 7300
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
143 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon 540X155 FPSGeForce Go 7300143 FPSRadeon 540X109 FPSGeForce Go 7300101 FPSRadeon 540X58 FPSGeForce Go 730054 FPSRadeon 540X21 FPSGeForce Go 730019 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon 540X100 FPSGeForce Go 730093 FPSRadeon 540X86 FPSGeForce Go 730080 FPSRadeon 540X42 FPSGeForce Go 730039 FPSRadeon 540X14 FPSGeForce Go 730013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon 540X126 FPSGeForce Go 7300117 FPSRadeon 540X81 FPSGeForce Go 730076 FPSRadeon 540X52 FPSGeForce Go 730049 FPSRadeon 540X31 FPSGeForce Go 730029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon 540X81 FPSGeForce Go 730076 FPSRadeon 540X68 FPSGeForce Go 730063 FPSRadeon 540X38 FPSGeForce Go 730035 FPSRadeon 540X14 FPSGeForce Go 730013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100312810%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100362825%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100383217%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100423518%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100413419%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100383217%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100453622%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100383314%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.09.3
Vulkan1.3Not supported
OpenGL4.62.1
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1CUDA / OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePolarisCurie
Process node14 nmBetter90 nm
Release date20172006
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count2200 millionBetter112 million
Die size103 mm²81 mm²Better
Shader units / cores384Not publicly specified
Base clock1183 MHzBetter350 MHz
Boost clock1183 MHzBetter350 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessSingle-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU250 WOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM1 GB GDDR5Better0.064 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus32 bit64 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.908Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 66
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon 540X or GeForce Go 7300?+
Radeon 540X has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce Go 7300 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce Go 7300 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce Go 7300 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon 540X offers more overall performance, while Radeon 540X offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce Go 7300 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce Go 7300 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon 540X leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon 540X can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon 540X is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon 540X is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon 540X is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon 540X if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.