AMD
Radeon RX 6700M vs Intel Arc A310
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc A310
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6700M and Arc A310 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon RX 6700M outperforms Arc A310 by ~39% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+39%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6700M (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6700M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider Arc A310
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4633
100100
60100
7460
Graphics card ranking
Positions 7–12of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A310
60 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
53
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
DirectX
Vulkan
Length
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Release date
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 6700M and Arc A310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon RX 6700MArc A310
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
204 FPS
165 FPS
1080p Ultra
143 FPS
116 FPS
1440p Ultra
111 FPS
62 FPS
4K Ultra
38 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 6700M204 FPSArc A310165 FPSRadeon RX 6700M143 FPSArc A310116 FPSRadeon RX 6700M111 FPSArc A31062 FPSRadeon RX 6700M38 FPSArc A31022 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 6700M132 FPSArc A310106 FPSRadeon RX 6700M113 FPSArc A31092 FPSRadeon RX 6700M81 FPSArc A31045 FPSRadeon RX 6700M26 FPSArc A31015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 6700M166 FPSArc A310134 FPSRadeon RX 6700M107 FPSArc A31087 FPSRadeon RX 6700M100 FPSArc A31056 FPSRadeon RX 6700M56 FPSArc A31033 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 6700M107 FPSArc A31087 FPSRadeon RX 6700M90 FPSArc A31073 FPSRadeon RX 6700M72 FPSArc A31041 FPSRadeon RX 6700M26 FPSArc A31015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100463333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100554227%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100544127%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100746021%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100594527%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100574426%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100544127%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100624825%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100554129%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe-HPG
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20212022
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count17200 millionBetter7200 million
Die size335 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Base clock1489 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter2000 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x8
LengthOEM dependentVaries by board
ThicknessIGPSingle-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent200 W
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentmini-DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM10 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus160 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS11.06Better2.688
Other comparisons
GTX 1650NVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6700M or Arc A310?+
Radeon RX 6700M has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A310 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 6700M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 6700M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6700M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6700M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 6700M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A310 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6700M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6700M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6700M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6700M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.