AMD
Radeon RX 6800M vs Intel Arc Pro B60
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc Pro B60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6800M and Arc Pro B60 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon RX 6800M outperforms Arc Pro B60 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6800M (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6800M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B60
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4952
10087
80100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 3–8of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800M
168 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
87
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die size
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor count
Device class
Release date
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 6800M and Arc Pro B60 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon RX 6800MArc Pro B60
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
208 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
146 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
113 FPS
—
4K Ultra
48 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 6800M208 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M146 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M113 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M48 FPSArc Pro B60—
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 6800M134 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M115 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M82 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M32 FPSArc Pro B60—
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 6800M169 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M109 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M102 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M71 FPSArc Pro B60—
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 6800M109 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M92 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M74 FPSArc Pro B60—Radeon RX 6800M33 FPSArc Pro B60—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10049526%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10058603%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100586511%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008010022%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008714%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100637416%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100617115%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100586511%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100667817%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100586613%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.2DirectX 12 Ultimate
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.6Up to 4.6
UpscalingFSRIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe2
Process node7 nmTSMC N5Better
Release date2021Q2'25
Device classMobileProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count17200 millionNot publicly specified
Die size335 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Better20 Xe cores
Base clock2116 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2390 MHzNot publicly specified
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI Express 5.0 x8
LengthOEM dependentVaries by board manufacturer
ThicknessIGPVaries by board manufacturer
Recommended PSUOEM dependentNot publicly specified
Power connectorNoneVaries by board manufacturer
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1; board dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 2.1; board dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentVaries by board manufacturer
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 x 4320@120Hz
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit192 bit
TFLOPS12.2412.28Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 23 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (1)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6800M or Arc Pro B60?+
Radeon RX 6800M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 6800M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 6800M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6800M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6800M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6800M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6800M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6800M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6800M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.