AMD
Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro P6000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 7600M and Quadro P6000 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon RX 7600M outperforms Quadro P6000 by ~4% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 15, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7600M (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 7600M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider Quadro P6000
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · No dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4659
10079
6027
68100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 9–14of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
161 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46
59Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
49Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37
46Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
79
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
54Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Architecture
Length
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache—
Clock speed—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequency—
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Release date
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 7600M and Quadro P6000 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon RX 7600MQuadro P6000
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
218 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
153 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
106 FPS
—
4K Ultra
31 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 7600M218 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M153 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M106 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M31 FPSQuadro P6000—
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 7600M141 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M121 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M77 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M21 FPSQuadro P6000—
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 7600M178 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M115 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M96 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M46 FPSQuadro P6000—
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 7600M115 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M96 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M69 FPSQuadro P6000—Radeon RX 7600M21 FPSQuadro P6000—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100465925%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100546518%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100527030%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006810038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007923%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100567732%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100557531%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100527030%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100588234%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100537129%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212 (feature level 12_1)
Vulkan1.4Vulkan 1.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNo dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3Pascal
Process node6 nmBetter16 nm
Release date20232016
Device classMobileProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13300 millionBetter11.8 billion
Die size204 mm²Better471 mm²
Shader units / cores17923840 CUDA coresBetter
Base clock1500 MHz1506 MHzBetter
Boost clock2410 MHzBetter1645 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorNone1× 8-pin PCIe
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependent0 native (DisplayPort adapter supported)
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-COEM dependentNot supported
Max monitorsOEM dependent4 simultaneous displays
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680×4320 at 30 Hz via DisplayPort 1.4
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR624 GBBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Memory bus128 bit384-bitBetter
TFLOPS17.27Better12.0
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M or Quadro P6000?+
Radeon RX 7600M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 7600M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Quadro P6000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Quadro P6000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Quadro P6000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.