AMD
Radeon RX 7900M vs Intel Arc A750
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc A750
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 7900M and Arc A750 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon RX 7900M outperforms Arc A750 by ~29% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+29%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7900M (~13%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 7900M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider Arc A750
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6651
10076
64100
8868
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900M
141 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66Better
51
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
54Better
43
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
76
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
61
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 7900M and Arc A750 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon RX 7900MArc A750
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
271 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
191 FPS
156 FPS
1440p Ultra
148 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
74 FPS
47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 7900M271 FPSArc A750221 FPSRadeon RX 7900M191 FPSArc A750156 FPSRadeon RX 7900M148 FPSArc A750121 FPSRadeon RX 7900M74 FPSArc A75047 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 7900M175 FPSArc A750143 FPSRadeon RX 7900M151 FPSArc A750123 FPSRadeon RX 7900M107 FPSArc A75088 FPSRadeon RX 7900M49 FPSArc A75032 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 7900M221 FPSArc A750180 FPSRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSArc A750117 FPSRadeon RX 7900M133 FPSArc A750109 FPSRadeon RX 7900M108 FPSArc A75069 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSArc A750117 FPSRadeon RX 7900M120 FPSArc A75098 FPSRadeon RX 7900M96 FPSArc A75079 FPSRadeon RX 7900M50 FPSArc A75032 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100665126%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100705819%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100725625%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007627%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100765925%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100755826%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100725625%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100786026%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100735626%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3Xe-HPG
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20232022
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count57700 millionBetter21700 million
Die size529 mm²406 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better3584
Base clock1825 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2090 MHz2400 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependentVaries by board
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent550 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS38.52Better17.2
Other comparisons
RTX 3050 8 GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7900M or Arc A750?+
Radeon RX 7900M has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7900M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7900M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7900M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7900M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7900M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7900M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7900M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.