AMD
Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce MX350
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX350
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 7900M and GeForce MX350 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce MX350 by ~113% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+113%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7900M (~60%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 7900M
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce MX350
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6631
100100
6454
8856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX350
165 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
54Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price——
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 7900M and GeForce MX350 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Radeon RX 7900MGeForce MX350
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
271 FPS
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
191 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
148 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
74 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 7900M271 FPSGeForce MX350155 FPSRadeon RX 7900M191 FPSGeForce MX350109 FPSRadeon RX 7900M148 FPSGeForce MX35058 FPSRadeon RX 7900M74 FPSGeForce MX35021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 7900M175 FPSGeForce MX350100 FPSRadeon RX 7900M151 FPSGeForce MX35086 FPSRadeon RX 7900M107 FPSGeForce MX35042 FPSRadeon RX 7900M49 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 7900M221 FPSGeForce MX350126 FPSRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSGeForce MX35082 FPSRadeon RX 7900M133 FPSGeForce MX35052 FPSRadeon RX 7900M108 FPSGeForce MX35031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSGeForce MX35082 FPSRadeon RX 7900M120 FPSGeForce MX35068 FPSRadeon RX 7900M96 FPSGeForce MX35038 FPSRadeon RX 7900M50 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100663172%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100703567%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100723862%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100885644%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100764258%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100754159%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100723862%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100784554%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100733863%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 3Pascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20232020
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count57700 millionBetter3300 million
Die size529 mm²132 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better640
Base clock1825 MHzBetter747 MHz
Boost clock2090 MHzBetter937 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessIGPOEM dependent
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionDepends on host systemOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS38.52Better1.199
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7900M or GeForce MX350?+
Radeon RX 7900M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 7900M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7900M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7900M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7900M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7900M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7900M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.