Radeon RX 7900M vs Radeon RX 5500

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7900M and RX 5500 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms RX 5500 by ~78% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+78%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 7900M (~33%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 7900M

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR

Reasons to consider RX 5500

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6637
Efficiency
10082
Price / performance
64100
Memory capacity
8860
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 1–6of 411
Radeon RX 7900M#1position in the GPU ranking
RX 5500not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 7900M

141 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66Better
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
54Better
33
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
82
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
52

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
ArchitectureBetter
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Transistor countBetter

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Radeon RX 7900M and RX 5500 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Radeon RX 7900MRX 5500
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
271 FPS
189 FPS
1080p Ultra
191 FPS
133 FPS
1440p Ultra
148 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
74 FPS
23 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2Radeon RX 7900M271 FPSRX 5500189 FPSRadeon RX 7900M191 FPSRX 5500133 FPSRadeon RX 7900M148 FPSRX 550077 FPSRadeon RX 7900M74 FPSRX 550023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Radeon RX 7900M175 FPSRX 5500122 FPSRadeon RX 7900M151 FPSRX 5500105 FPSRadeon RX 7900M107 FPSRX 550056 FPSRadeon RX 7900M49 FPSRX 550015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Radeon RX 7900M221 FPSRX 5500154 FPSRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSRX 550099 FPSRadeon RX 7900M133 FPSRX 550070 FPSRadeon RX 7900M108 FPSRX 550034 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRadeon RX 7900M143 FPSRX 550099 FPSRadeon RX 7900M120 FPSRX 550083 FPSRadeon RX 7900M96 FPSRX 550050 FPSRadeon RX 7900M50 FPSRX 550016 FPS
Average FPSRadeon RX 7900M203 FPSRX 5500141 FPSRadeon RX 7900M151 FPSRX 5500105 FPSRadeon RX 7900M121 FPSRX 550063 FPSRadeon RX 7900M70 FPSRX 550022 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100663756%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100704446%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100724448%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008220%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100764845%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100754648%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100724448%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100785044%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100734450%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 1.0
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232019
Device classMobileDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
Transistor count57700 millionBetter6400 million
Die size529 mm²158 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4608Better1408
Base clock1825 MHzBetter1500 MHz
Boost clock2090 MHzBetter1845 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x8
LengthOEM dependentVaries by board
ThicknessIGPVaries by board
Recommended PSUOEM dependentVaries by board
Power connectorNone8 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependentVaries by board
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRadeon RX 7900MRX 5500
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS38.52Better5.196

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARadeon RX 7900M69
Device BRX 550052
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 69

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (4)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (3)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7900M or RX 5500?

Radeon RX 7900M has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5500 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Radeon RX 7900M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Radeon RX 7900M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Radeon RX 7900M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7900M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Radeon RX 7900M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 5500 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7900M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Radeon RX 7900M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 5500 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 5500 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7900M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.