GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon RX 5300M

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 5300M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 outperforms Radeon RX 5300M by ~18% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+18%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 2060 (~7%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 2060

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5300M

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4034
Efficiency
83100
Price / performance
6955
Memory capacity
6060
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 111–116of 321
RTX 2060not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Radeon RX 5300Mnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 2060

137 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
48Better
45

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
Shader units / coresBetter
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
HDMI

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 2060 and Radeon RX 5300M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
192 FPS
179 FPS
1080p Ultra
135 FPS
123 FPS
1440p Ultra
92 FPS
65 FPS
4K Ultra
28 FPS
22 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 2060192 FPSRadeon RX 5300M179 FPSRTX 2060135 FPSRadeon RX 5300M123 FPSRTX 206092 FPSRadeon RX 5300M65 FPSRTX 206028 FPSRadeon RX 5300M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 2060124 FPSRadeon RX 5300M116 FPSRTX 2060107 FPSRadeon RX 5300M97 FPSRTX 206067 FPSRadeon RX 5300M47 FPSRTX 206019 FPSRadeon RX 5300M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 2060156 FPSRadeon RX 5300M146 FPSRTX 2060101 FPSRadeon RX 5300M92 FPSRTX 206083 FPSRadeon RX 5300M59 FPSRTX 206042 FPSRadeon RX 5300M33 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 2060101 FPSRadeon RX 5300M95 FPSRTX 206085 FPSRadeon RX 5300M77 FPSRTX 206060 FPSRadeon RX 5300M42 FPSRTX 206019 FPSRadeon RX 5300M15 FPS
Average FPSRTX 2060143 FPSRadeon RX 5300M134 FPSRTX 2060107 FPSRadeon RX 5300M97 FPSRTX 206076 FPSRadeon RX 5300M53 FPSRTX 206027 FPSRadeon RX 5300M21 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300MDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100403416%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100454012%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300MDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049466%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048456%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046429%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 1
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20192019
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
Transistor count10800 millionBetter6400 million
Die size445 mm²158 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1920Better1408
Base clock1365 MHzBetter1000 MHz
Boost clock1680 MHzBetter1445 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
HDMIHDMI 2.0OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors5OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 2060Radeon RX 5300M
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better3 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter96 bit
TFLOPS6.451Better4.069

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 206048
Device BRadeon RX 5300M45
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 69

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (3)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (4)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record changed: product_prices
  3. · Record updated: products
  4. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 2060 or Radeon RX 5300M?

RTX 2060 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2060 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 2060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 2060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 2060 offers more overall performance, while RTX 2060 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 2060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 2060 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 2060 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 2060 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 2060 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Radeon RX 5300M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Radeon RX 5300M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 2060 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.