NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce GT 520M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 520M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 2070 and GeForce GT 520M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 2070 outperforms GeForce GT 520M by ~47% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+47%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 2070 (~5%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 2070
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4430
79100
3954
6843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 88–93of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
79
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
44Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Interface
Device class
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
TFLOPSBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 2070 and GeForce GT 520M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 2070GeForce GT 520M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
194 FPS
151 FPS
1080p Ultra
137 FPS
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
106 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
39 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 2070194 FPSGeForce GT 520M151 FPSRTX 2070137 FPSGeForce GT 520M106 FPSRTX 2070106 FPSGeForce GT 520M57 FPSRTX 207039 FPSGeForce GT 520M20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 2070125 FPSGeForce GT 520M97 FPSRTX 2070108 FPSGeForce GT 520M84 FPSRTX 207077 FPSGeForce GT 520M41 FPSRTX 207026 FPSGeForce GT 520M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 2070158 FPSGeForce GT 520M123 FPSRTX 2070103 FPSGeForce GT 520M79 FPSRTX 207096 FPSGeForce GT 520M51 FPSRTX 207058 FPSGeForce GT 520M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 2070103 FPSGeForce GT 520M79 FPSRTX 207086 FPSGeForce GT 520M66 FPSRTX 207069 FPSGeForce GT 520M37 FPSRTX 207027 FPSGeForce GT 520M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443038%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100493048%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100513440%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007910023%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100553642%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543543%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100513440%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100573743%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100513440%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.4Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringFermi
Process node12 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20182011
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10800 millionBetter585 million
Die size445 mm²116 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better48
Base clock1410 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock1620 MHzBetter600 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CYesOEM dependent
Max monitors5OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS7.465Better0.115
Other comparisons
RX 5600 XTAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 2070 or GeForce GT 520M?+
RTX 2070 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce GT 520M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 2070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 2070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce GT 520M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 2070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 2070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 2070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce GT 520M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce GT 520M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 2070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.