NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Intel Arc Pro B60
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc Pro B60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc Pro B60 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Arc Pro B60 by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB (~6%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 3050 6 GB
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B60
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
3952
10087
60100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 89–94of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
82 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
87
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DisplayPort
HDMI
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power consumption—
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc Pro B60 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3050 6 GBArc Pro B60
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
206 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
140 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
74 FPS
—
4K Ultra
25 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3050 6 GB206 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB140 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB74 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB25 FPSArc Pro B60—
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3050 6 GB133 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB111 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB54 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSArc Pro B60—
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3050 6 GB167 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB105 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB67 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB37 FPSArc Pro B60—
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3050 6 GB108 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB88 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB48 FPSArc Pro B60—RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSArc Pro B60—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100395229%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100446031%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100456536%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006010050%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008714%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100497441%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100487139%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100456536%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100517842%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100456638%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.2DirectX 12 Ultimate
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.6Up to 4.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Intel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmpereXe2
Process node8 nmTSMC N5Better
Release date2024Q2'25
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count8700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size200 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2304Better20 Xe cores
Base clock1042 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock1470 MHzNot publicly specified
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCI Express 5.0 x8
Length242 mmVaries by board manufacturer
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board manufacturer
Recommended PSU250 WNot publicly specified
Power connectorNoneVaries by board manufacturer
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1; board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1; board dependent
USB Type-CNoVaries by board manufacturer
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320@120Hz
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM6 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus96 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS6.77412.28Better
Other comparisons
GTX 1660NVIDIAVSRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAVS
RX 5500 XTAMDOpen comparisonRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAVSRX 5600AMDOpen comparisonRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAVSRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAVSRTX 2080NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3050 6 GBNVIDIAVSRTX 2080 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 23 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 6 GB or Arc Pro B60?+
RTX 3050 6 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3050 6 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 6 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.