H2H

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600G

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vega II 7CU 4600G outperforms RTX 3050 6 GB by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+13%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600G: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G shows a 13% advantage for Vega II 7CU 4600G in gaming performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
3944
Price / performance
100100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 3050 6 GB is the best overall choice

RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE7%

RTX 3050 6 GB leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$95

Vega II 7CU 4600G costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 109–114of 317
RTX 3050 6 GBnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Vega II 7CU 4600Gnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600G

180 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600G

100/100 · Price $119

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS6.774Better1.9
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power consumption70 W
Power connectorNone
Release date20242020
ArchitectureAmpereNot publicly specified
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$229
Shader units / cores2304Not publicly specified
Clock speed1042 - 1470 MHzBetter400 - 1900 MHz
Base clock1042 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1470 MHz1900 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency14 GHz
Memory bus96 bit
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Power consumption70 W
Process node8 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 WVaries by board
Length242 mmVaries by board
Die size200 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count8700 millionNot publicly specified
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 65%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3050 6 GB206 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 7CU 4600G183 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB140 FPSEstimated 73%Vega II 7CU 4600G128 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB74 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G100 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB25 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 7CU 4600G50 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3050 6 GB133 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 7CU 4600G118 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB111 FPSEstimated 73%Vega II 7CU 4600G101 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB54 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G72 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 7CU 4600G33 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3050 6 GB167 FPSEstimated 80%Vega II 7CU 4600G149 FPSEstimated 80%RTX 3050 6 GB105 FPSEstimated 73%Vega II 7CU 4600G96 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB67 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G90 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB37 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 7CU 4600G73 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3050 6 GB108 FPSEstimated 74%Vega II 7CU 4600G96 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB88 FPSEstimated 73%Vega II 7CU 4600G80 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB48 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G65 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSEstimated 62%Vega II 7CU 4600G34 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 4600G22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Vega II 7CU 4600G18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 4600G14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Vega II 7CU 4600G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSRTX 3050 6 GB76 FPSVega II 7CU 4600G68 FPSRTX 3050 6 GB56 FPSVega II 7CU 4600G51 FPSRTX 3050 6 GB30 FPSVega II 7CU 4600G41 FPSRTX 3050 6 GB13 FPSVega II 7CU 4600G24 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600GDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100394412%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044477%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045442%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600GDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100494411%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045442%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045442%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
ArchitectureAmpereNot publicly specified
Process node8 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20242020
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
Transistor count8700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size200 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2304Not publicly specified
Base clock1042 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1470 MHz1900 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Length242 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU250 WVaries by board
Power connectorNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Vega II 7CU 4600G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 6 GBVega II 7CU 4600G
VRAM6 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus96 bit
TFLOPS6.774Better1.9
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 3050 6 GB62
Device BVega II 7CU 4600G58
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 6 GB or Vega II 7CU 4600G?

RTX 3050 6 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3050 6 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3050 6 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 6 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.