GeForce RTX 3060 8GB vs Radeon R9 285

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3060 8GB and R9 285 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3060 8GB outperforms R9 285 by ~35% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+35%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3060 8GB (~15%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 3060 8GB

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2

Reasons to consider R9 285

  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4634
Efficiency
9060
Price / performance
65100
Memory capacity
6856
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 56–61of 321
RTX 3060 8GB#58position in the GPU ranking
R9 285not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon R9 285

108 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

Radeon R9 285

Price $50.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
90Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
53Better
46

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Shader units / coresBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3060 8GB and R9 285 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3060 8GBR9 285
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
223 FPS
175 FPS
1080p Ultra
157 FPS
120 FPS
1440p Ultra
107 FPS
65 FPS
4K Ultra
31 FPS
24 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3060 8GB223 FPSR9 285175 FPSRTX 3060 8GB157 FPSR9 285120 FPSRTX 3060 8GB107 FPSR9 28565 FPSRTX 3060 8GB31 FPSR9 28524 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3060 8GB144 FPSR9 285113 FPSRTX 3060 8GB124 FPSR9 28595 FPSRTX 3060 8GB77 FPSR9 28547 FPSRTX 3060 8GB21 FPSR9 28516 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3060 8GB182 FPSR9 285142 FPSRTX 3060 8GB118 FPSR9 28590 FPSRTX 3060 8GB96 FPSR9 28558 FPSRTX 3060 8GB46 FPSR9 28535 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3060 8GB118 FPSR9 28592 FPSRTX 3060 8GB98 FPSR9 28575 FPSRTX 3060 8GB69 FPSR9 28542 FPSRTX 3060 8GB21 FPSR9 28516 FPS
Average FPSRTX 3060 8GB167 FPSR9 285131 FPSRTX 3060 8GB124 FPSR9 28595 FPSRTX 3060 8GB87 FPSR9 28553 FPSRTX 3060 8GB30 FPSR9 28523 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 3060 8GBR9 285Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100463430%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100513732%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100906040%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 3060 8GBR9 285Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100564424%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100554324%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100584623%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100534028%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 3.0
Process node8 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20222014
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
Transistor count12000 millionBetter5000 million
Die size276 mm²Better366 mm²
Shader units / cores3584Better1792
Base clock1320 MHzBetter918 MHz
Boost clock1777 MHzBetter918 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length242 mm221 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W450 W
Power connector8 pin6+6 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 3060 8GBR9 285
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS12.74Better3.29

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 3060 8GB53
Device BR9 28546
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 70

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (5)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record changed: product_prices
  4. · Record updated: products
  5. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3060 8GB or R9 285?

RTX 3060 8GB has the higher overall gaming score, while R9 285 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3060 8GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3060 8GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3060 8GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3060 8GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3060 8GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

R9 285 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3060 8GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3060 8GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3060 8GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RTX 3060 8GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RTX 3060 8GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3060 8GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.