GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Radeon R7 370

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3070 Ti and R7 370 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms R7 370 by ~68% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+68%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (~2%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 3070 Ti

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2

Reasons to consider R7 370

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5734
Efficiency
66100
Price / performance
61100
Memory capacity
6856
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 45–50of 321
RTX 3070 Ti#47position in the GPU ranking
R7 370not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon R7 370

160 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

Radeon R7 370

Price $33.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 3070 TiR7 370
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
66
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55Better
54

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 3070 TiR7 370
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
USB Type-C
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
DirectX
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
HDMI

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3070 Ti and R7 370 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3070 TiR7 370
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
246 FPS
174 FPS
1080p Ultra
173 FPS
119 FPS
1440p Ultra
134 FPS
65 FPS
4K Ultra
55 FPS
24 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3070 Ti246 FPSR7 370174 FPSRTX 3070 Ti173 FPSR7 370119 FPSRTX 3070 Ti134 FPSR7 37065 FPSRTX 3070 Ti55 FPSR7 37024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3070 Ti159 FPSR7 370113 FPSRTX 3070 Ti137 FPSR7 37094 FPSRTX 3070 Ti97 FPSR7 37047 FPSRTX 3070 Ti37 FPSR7 37016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3070 Ti200 FPSR7 370142 FPSRTX 3070 Ti130 FPSR7 37089 FPSRTX 3070 Ti121 FPSR7 37058 FPSRTX 3070 Ti80 FPSR7 37035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3070 Ti130 FPSR7 37092 FPSRTX 3070 Ti108 FPSR7 37075 FPSRTX 3070 Ti87 FPSR7 37042 FPSRTX 3070 Ti37 FPSR7 37016 FPS
Average FPSRTX 3070 Ti184 FPSR7 370130 FPSRTX 3070 Ti137 FPSR7 37094 FPSRTX 3070 Ti110 FPSR7 37053 FPSRTX 3070 Ti52 FPSR7 37023 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 3070 TiR7 370Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100573451%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100593746%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100604040%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006610041%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 3070 TiR7 370Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100624434%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100624336%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100604040%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100634631%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100604040%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
DirectX12.211.1
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 1.2

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
ArchitectureAmpereGCN 1.0
Process node8 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20212015
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
Transistor count17400 millionBetter2800 million
Die size392 mm²212 mm²Better
Shader units / cores6144Better1024
Base clock1575 MHzBetter925 MHz
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter975 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm152 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W300 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 3070 TiR7 370
VRAM8 GB GDDR6XBetter2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS21.75Better1.997

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 3070 Ti55
Device BR7 37054
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 70

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (5)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record changed: product_prices
  4. · Record updated: products
  5. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3070 Ti or R7 370?

RTX 3070 Ti has the higher overall gaming score, while R7 370 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3070 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3070 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3070 Ti offers more overall performance, while RTX 3070 Ti offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3070 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

R7 370 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3070 Ti leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3070 Ti can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3070 Ti is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

R7 370 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

R7 370 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3070 Ti if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.