NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce GTX 680
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 680
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 3070 and GTX 680 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 3070 outperforms GTX 680 by ~57% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+57%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3070 (~53%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 3070
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider GTX 680
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5535
8360
8169
6856
Graphics card ranking
Positions 36–41of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3070
127 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 680
Price $37.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3070 and GTX 680 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3070GTX 680
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
242 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
170 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
132 FPS
67 FPS
4K Ultra
49 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3070242 FPSGTX 680178 FPSRTX 3070170 FPSGTX 680122 FPSRTX 3070132 FPSGTX 68067 FPSRTX 307049 FPSGTX 68024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3070156 FPSGTX 680115 FPSRTX 3070135 FPSGTX 68096 FPSRTX 307096 FPSGTX 68048 FPSRTX 307033 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3070197 FPSGTX 680145 FPSRTX 3070128 FPSGTX 68091 FPSRTX 3070119 FPSGTX 68060 FPSRTX 307072 FPSGTX 68035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3070128 FPSGTX 68094 FPSRTX 3070107 FPSGTX 68076 FPSRTX 307086 FPSGTX 68043 FPSRTX 307033 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100553544%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100573840%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100836032%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100614432%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100604333%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100624630%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmpereKepler
Process node8 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20202012
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count17400 millionBetter3540 million
Die size392 mm²294 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5888Better1536
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1006 MHz
Boost clock1730 MHzBetter1058 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length242 mmBetter256 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W450 WBetter
Power connector8 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS20.31Better3.25
Other comparisons
Arc A750Intel
RX 7600 XTAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3070 or GTX 680?+
RTX 3070 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3070 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3070 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 680 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 680 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.