NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro NVS 315
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 315
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 3070 and Quadro NVS 315 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 3070 outperforms Quadro NVS 315 by ~20% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+20%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3070 (~20%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 3070
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider Quadro NVS 315
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5530
83100
81100
6843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 36–41of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3070
127 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Quadro NVS 315
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
51
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector—
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Base clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3070 and Quadro NVS 315 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3070Quadro NVS 315
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
242 FPS
154 FPS
1080p Ultra
170 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
132 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
49 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3070242 FPSQuadro NVS 315154 FPSRTX 3070170 FPSQuadro NVS 315108 FPSRTX 3070132 FPSQuadro NVS 31558 FPSRTX 307049 FPSQuadro NVS 31521 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3070156 FPSQuadro NVS 31599 FPSRTX 3070135 FPSQuadro NVS 31585 FPSRTX 307096 FPSQuadro NVS 31542 FPSRTX 307033 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3070197 FPSQuadro NVS 315125 FPSRTX 3070128 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSRTX 3070119 FPSQuadro NVS 31552 FPSRTX 307072 FPSQuadro NVS 31531 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3070128 FPSQuadro NVS 31581 FPSRTX 3070107 FPSQuadro NVS 31568 FPSRTX 307086 FPSQuadro NVS 31538 FPSRTX 307033 FPSQuadro NVS 31514 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100553059%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100573062%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100593454%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100613652%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100603553%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100593454%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100623751%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100593454%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6—
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmpereNot publicly specified
Process node8 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20202013
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count17400 millionNot publicly specified
Die size392 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores5888Not publicly specified
Base clock1500 MHzBetter523 MHz
Boost clock1730 MHzBetter523 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length242 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU550 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS20.31Better0.026
Other comparisons
Arc A750Intel
RX 7600 XTAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3070 or Quadro NVS 315?+
RTX 3070 has the higher overall gaming score, while Quadro NVS 315 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Quadro NVS 315 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Quadro NVS 315 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.