GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 6450M

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6450M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070 outperforms Radeon RX 6450M by ~67% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+67%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3070 (~39%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 3070

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 6450M

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.2 · FSR
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5533
Efficiency
83100
Price / performance
8155
Memory capacity
6860
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 36–41of 321
RTX 3070#38position in the GPU ranking
Radeon RX 6450Mnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6450M

139 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
44

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / coresBetter
Base clockBetter
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6450M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
242 FPS
167 FPS
1080p Ultra
170 FPS
117 FPS
1440p Ultra
132 FPS
63 FPS
4K Ultra
49 FPS
23 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3070242 FPSRadeon RX 6450M167 FPSRTX 3070170 FPSRadeon RX 6450M117 FPSRTX 3070132 FPSRadeon RX 6450M63 FPSRTX 307049 FPSRadeon RX 6450M23 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3070156 FPSRadeon RX 6450M108 FPSRTX 3070135 FPSRadeon RX 6450M92 FPSRTX 307096 FPSRadeon RX 6450M46 FPSRTX 307033 FPSRadeon RX 6450M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3070197 FPSRadeon RX 6450M136 FPSRTX 3070128 FPSRadeon RX 6450M88 FPSRTX 3070119 FPSRadeon RX 6450M57 FPSRTX 307072 FPSRadeon RX 6450M33 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3070128 FPSRadeon RX 6450M88 FPSRTX 3070107 FPSRadeon RX 6450M73 FPSRTX 307086 FPSRadeon RX 6450M41 FPSRTX 307033 FPSRadeon RX 6450M15 FPS
Average FPSRTX 3070181 FPSRadeon RX 6450M125 FPSRTX 3070135 FPSRadeon RX 6450M93 FPSRTX 3070108 FPSRadeon RX 6450M52 FPSRTX 307047 FPSRadeon RX 6450M22 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450MDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100553350%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100574426%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450MDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100614530%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100604431%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100624825%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594136%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.2

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20202023
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
Transistor count17400 millionBetter5400 million
Die size392 mm²107 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5888Better768
Base clock1500 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Boost clock1730 MHz2460 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length242 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU550 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 3070Radeon RX 6450M
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS20.31Better3.779

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 307061
Device BRadeon RX 6450M44
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 69

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (3)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (4)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record changed: product_prices
  3. · Record updated: products
  4. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3070 or Radeon RX 6450M?

RTX 3070 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3070 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 3070 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Radeon RX 6450M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Radeon RX 6450M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.