GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs Intel Arc 140V

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3080 Ti and Intel Arc 140V across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms Intel Arc 140V by ~76% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+76%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (~48%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 3080 Ti

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2

Reasons to consider Intel Arc 140V

  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
6738
Price / performance
4565
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 20–25of 321
RTX 3080 Ti#22position in the GPU ranking
Intel Arc 140Vnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Intel Arc 140V

85 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
67Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
64Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
40

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
Power consumption
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / cores
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3080 Ti and Intel Arc 140V across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
276 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
194 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
151 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
75 FPS
43 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3080 Ti276 FPSIntel Arc 140V157 FPSRTX 3080 Ti194 FPSIntel Arc 140V111 FPSRTX 3080 Ti151 FPSIntel Arc 140V86 FPSRTX 3080 Ti75 FPSIntel Arc 140V43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3080 Ti178 FPSIntel Arc 140V102 FPSRTX 3080 Ti153 FPSIntel Arc 140V88 FPSRTX 3080 Ti109 FPSIntel Arc 140V62 FPSRTX 3080 Ti50 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3080 Ti225 FPSIntel Arc 140V128 FPSRTX 3080 Ti145 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSRTX 3080 Ti136 FPSIntel Arc 140V77 FPSRTX 3080 Ti110 FPSIntel Arc 140V63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3080 Ti145 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSRTX 3080 Ti122 FPSIntel Arc 140V69 FPSRTX 3080 Ti98 FPSIntel Arc 140V56 FPSRTX 3080 Ti51 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
Average FPSRTX 3080 Ti206 FPSIntel Arc 140V118 FPSRTX 3080 Ti154 FPSIntel Arc 140V88 FPSRTX 3080 Ti124 FPSIntel Arc 140V70 FPSRTX 3080 Ti72 FPSIntel Arc 140V41 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140VDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100673855%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100673855%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100713861%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100640200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140VDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100733863%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100723862%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100713861%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100743864%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100713861%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
ArchitectureAmpereXe2 LPG
Process node8 nm
Release date20212024
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
Transistor count28300 millionNot publicly specified
Die size628 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores10240Not publicly specified
Base clock1365 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock1665 MHzOEM/TGP dependent

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
InterfacePCIe 4x16OEM platform dependent
Length285 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU750 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinIntegrated laptop power

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 3080 TiIntel Arc 140V
VRAM12 GB GDDR6XOEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR6XShared LPDDR5X
Memory bus384 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS34.1OEM/TGP dependent

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 3080 Ti59
Device BIntel Arc 140V40
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 63

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (3)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (4)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record changed: product_prices
  3. · Record updated: products
  4. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3080 Ti or Intel Arc 140V?

RTX 3080 Ti has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Arc 140V offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3080 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3080 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3080 Ti offers more overall performance, while RTX 3080 Ti offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3080 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Intel Arc 140V is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3080 Ti leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3080 Ti can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3080 Ti is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RTX 3080 Ti is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RTX 3080 Ti is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3080 Ti if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.