NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro P5000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 3080 outperforms Quadro P5000 by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 3080 (~10%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 3080
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider Quadro P5000
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · No dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6458
67100
10058
7488
Graphics card ranking
Positions 23–28of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3080
130 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
64Better
58
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
48
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
50Better
46
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
62
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Vulkan
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Clock speed—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequency—
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache—
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3080Quadro P5000
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
266 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
187 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
145 FPS
—
4K Ultra
67 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3080266 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080187 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080145 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 308067 FPSQuadro P5000—
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3080172 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080148 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080105 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 308045 FPSQuadro P5000—
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3080216 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080140 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080131 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 308099 FPSQuadro P5000—
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3080140 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 3080117 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 308094 FPSQuadro P5000—RTX 308046 FPSQuadro P5000—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100645810%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065625%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10067662%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100748817%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006710040%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10069724%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068703%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10067662%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10070757%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10067670%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212 (feature level 12_1)
Vulkan1.4Vulkan 1.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2No dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAmperePascal
Process node8 nmBetter16 nm
Release date20202016
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count28300 millionBetter7.2 billion
Die size628 mm²314 mm²Better
Shader units / cores8704Better2560 CUDA cores
Base clock1440 MHz1607 MHzBetter
Boost clock1710 MHz1733 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length285 mm267 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot (38 mm)
Recommended PSU700 W450 WBetter
Power connector16 pin1× 8-pin PCIe
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.10 native (DisplayPort adapter supported)
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-CNoNot supported
Max monitors44 simultaneous displays
Max resolution7680 × 43207680×4320 at 30 Hz via DisplayPort 1.4
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM10 GB GDDR6X16 GBBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5X
Memory bus320 bitBetter256-bit
TFLOPS29.77Better8.9
Other comparisons
RX 7700AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3080 or Quadro P5000?+
RTX 3080 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3080 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3080 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3080 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3080 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.