NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX Vega 64
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4060 and RX Vega 64 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX Vega 64 outperforms RTX 4060 by ~2% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+2%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4060 (~16%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4060
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider RX Vega 64
- Higher catalog performance index
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4647
10053
4146
6868
Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX Vega 64
150 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Price $100.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46
47Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
40
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37
38Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
53
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
50Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Power consumptionBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4060 and RX Vega 64 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4060RX Vega 64
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
216 FPS
205 FPS
1080p Ultra
152 FPS
144 FPS
1440p Ultra
107 FPS
112 FPS
4K Ultra
32 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4060216 FPSRX Vega 64205 FPSRTX 4060152 FPSRX Vega 64144 FPSRTX 4060107 FPSRX Vega 64112 FPSRTX 406032 FPSRX Vega 6443 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4060139 FPSRX Vega 64133 FPSRTX 4060120 FPSRX Vega 64114 FPSRTX 406078 FPSRX Vega 6481 FPSRTX 406021 FPSRX Vega 6429 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4060176 FPSRX Vega 64167 FPSRTX 4060114 FPSRX Vega 64108 FPSRTX 406097 FPSRX Vega 64101 FPSRTX 406046 FPSRX Vega 6463 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4060114 FPSRX Vega 64108 FPSRTX 406095 FPSRX Vega 6491 FPSRTX 406070 FPSRX Vega 6473 FPSRTX 406022 FPSRX Vega 6429 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10046472%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10055518%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10052532%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005361%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10056572%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10055562%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10052532%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10058592%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10053530%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGCN 5.0
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20232017
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count18900 millionBetter12500 million
Die size159 mm²Better495 mm²
Shader units / cores30724096Better
Base clock1830 MHzBetter1247 MHz
Boost clock2460 MHzBetter1546 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Length240 mmBetter280 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter600 W
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB HBM2
Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
TFLOPS15.11Better12.66
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4060 or RX Vega 64?+
RTX 4060 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX Vega 64 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4060 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4060 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX Vega 64 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4060 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4060 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4060 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4060 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4060 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4060 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.