NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs GeForce 920MX
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 920MX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and GeForce 920MX across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms GeForce 920MX by ~130% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+130%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (~55%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider GeForce 920MX
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6930
81100
5254
8843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 15–20of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 920MX
155 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
69Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
56Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Thickness
Power connector
Memory type
Release date
Architecture
Compute API
VRAMBetter
Clock speedBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Die sizeBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Length
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Memory cache
Memory frequencyBetter
Interface
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and GeForce 920MX across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPERGeForce 920MX
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
286 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
201 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
156 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
78 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4070 Ti SUPER286 FPSGeForce 920MX153 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER201 FPSGeForce 920MX107 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER156 FPSGeForce 920MX58 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER78 FPSGeForce 920MX21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4070 Ti SUPER185 FPSGeForce 920MX99 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER159 FPSGeForce 920MX85 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER113 FPSGeForce 920MX42 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER52 FPSGeForce 920MX14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4070 Ti SUPER233 FPSGeForce 920MX125 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER151 FPSGeForce 920MX81 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER141 FPSGeForce 920MX52 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER114 FPSGeForce 920MX31 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4070 Ti SUPER151 FPSGeForce 920MX81 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER126 FPSGeForce 920MX67 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER101 FPSGeForce 920MX37 FPSRTX 4070 Ti SUPER53 FPSGeForce 920MX14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100693079%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100753280%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100743474%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008110021%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100783674%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100773575%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100743474%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100793772%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100753475%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 5.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceMaxwell
Process node5 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20242016
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count45900 millionBetter1020 million
Die size379 mm²77 mm²Better
Shader units / cores8448Better256
Base clock2340 MHzBetter965 MHz
Boost clock2610 MHzBetter993 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length310 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessTriple-slotMXM Module
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6XBetter2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS44.1Better0.508
Other comparisons
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6NVIDIAVSRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4060 Ti 16GBNVIDIAVSRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4060 Ti 8GBNVIDIAVSRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 4080NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 5060 Ti 8GBNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4070 Ti SUPERNVIDIAVS
RX 9060AMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 Ti SUPER or GeForce 920MX?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 920MX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 920MX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 920MX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 920MX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 Ti SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.