GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPERVSRadeon RX 7800 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7800 XT+4%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
VSWINNERRX 7800 XT4%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 7800 XT
Performance6662
Efficiency7779
Price / Performance7297
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6662
7779
7297
8888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti SUPER0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 7800 XT0No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 7800 XT is the best overall choice
RX 7800 XT leads in combined gaming performance. RX 7800 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7800 XT leads in the combined performance index
RX 7800 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 21–26of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7800 XT
97/100 · Price $499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66Better
62
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
60Better
57
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
49
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
77
79Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69
72Better
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6X16 GB GDDR6
Clock speed2340 - 2610 MHzBetter1295 - 2430 MHz
Power consumption285 W263 WBetter
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2340 MHzBetter1295 MHz
Boost clock2610 MHzBetter2430 MHz
Length——
Thickness——
Power connector16 pinBetter8+8 pin
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth672 GB/sBetter621 GB/s
Memory cache——
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GB16 GB
Memory frequency21 GHzBetter19,4 GHz
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
TDP285 W263 WBetter
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date2024Better2023
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS44.1Better37.32
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10066626%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10072694%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10072694%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10077793%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10076743%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10075724%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10072694%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10078763%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10073704%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date2024Better2023
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2340 MHzBetter1295 MHz
Boost clock2610 MHzBetter2430 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector16 pinBetter8+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM16 GB GDDR6X16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth672 GB/sBetter621 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 Ti SUPER or RX 7800 XT?+
RX 7800 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7800 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7800 XT offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7800 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7800 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7800 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7800 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7800 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7800 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.