NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1630
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 1630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4070 outperforms GTX 1630 by 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+88%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1630: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 shows a 88% advantage for RTX 4070 in gaming performance, while GTX 1630 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6032
100100
87100
8060
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 4070 is the best overall choice
RTX 4070 leads in combined game performance. GTX 1630 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 4070 leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1630 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 19–24of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4070
76 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1630
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 3—
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS29.15Better1.828
Power consumption200 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Power connector16 pinNone
Release date20232022
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$599$119Better
Shader units / cores5888Better512
Length240 mm145 mmBetter
Clock speed1920 - 2475 MHzBetter1740 - 1785 MHz
Base clock1920 MHzBetter1740 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter1785 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6XBetter4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency21 GHzBetter12 GHz
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth504 GB/sBetter96 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x8
Power consumption200 W75 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Die size294 mm²200 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 36 MBL1 64 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count35800 millionBetter4700 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4070GTX 1630
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
30 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
25 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 65%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4070250 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1630162 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070176 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1630114 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070137 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163062 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 407064 FPSEstimated 73%GTX 163022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4070161 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1630105 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070139 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163090 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 407099 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163045 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 407043 FPSEstimated 73%GTX 163015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4070204 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1630132 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 4070132 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163086 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070123 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163055 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 407094 FPSEstimated 73%GTX 163032 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4070132 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163086 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070110 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163072 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 407089 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 163040 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 407044 FPSEstimated 73%GTX 163015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRTX 407030 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163019 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407025 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 163016 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 407019 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16309 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 407010 FPSEstimated 65%GTX 16305 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100603261%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100664049%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100664049%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100806029%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100694542%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100664049%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100714839%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664147%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3—
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
Process node5 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20232022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count35800 millionBetter4700 million
Die size294 mm²200 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5888Better512
Base clock1920 MHzBetter1740 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter1785 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x8
Length240 mm145 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 4070 and GTX 1630 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM12 GB GDDR6XBetter4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS29.15Better1.828
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 or GTX 1630?+
RTX 4070 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1630 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1630 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1630 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1630 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.