NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs GeForce MX250
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce MX250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4080 SUPER and GeForce MX250 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GeForce MX250 by ~145% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+145%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (~60%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4080 SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider GeForce MX250
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7631
79100
4854
8856
What streamers use
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIARTX 4080 SUPER2NVIDIAGeForce MX2500No verified public setup yet
Graphics card ranking
Positions 5–10of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
137 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
79
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Thickness
Power connector
Memory type
Release date
Compute API
VRAMBetter
Clock speedBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Die sizeBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Length
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Memory cache
Memory frequencyBetter
Interface
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Transistor countBetter
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4080 SUPER and GeForce MX250 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4080 SUPERGeForce MX250
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
313 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
220 FPS
110 FPS
1440p Ultra
171 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
85 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4080 SUPER313 FPSGeForce MX250157 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER220 FPSGeForce MX250110 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER171 FPSGeForce MX25059 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER85 FPSGeForce MX25021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4080 SUPER202 FPSGeForce MX250101 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER174 FPSGeForce MX25087 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER124 FPSGeForce MX25043 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER57 FPSGeForce MX25014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4080 SUPER232 FPSGeForce MX250128 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER165 FPSGeForce MX25083 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER154 FPSGeForce MX25053 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER125 FPSGeForce MX25031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4080 SUPER165 FPSGeForce MX25083 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER138 FPSGeForce MX25069 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER111 FPSGeForce MX25038 FPSRTX 4080 SUPER58 FPSGeForce MX25015 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100763184%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100885644%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007910023%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100814263%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100814166%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793870%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100834559%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100803871%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNVIDIA Ada LovelacePascal / Turing / Ampere
Process node5 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20242019
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count45900 millionBetter1800 million
Die size379 mm²74 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10240Better384
Base clock2295 MHzBetter1519 MHz
Boost clock2550 MHzBetter1582 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length310 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessTriple-slotIGP
Recommended PSU700 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6XBetter2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5 / GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS52.22Better1.215
Other comparisons
RTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAVS
RX 7900 GREAMDOpen comparisonRTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAVSRX 9060 XT 16GBAMDOpen comparison
Arc B770IntelVSRTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 3080NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 3080 12GBNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4080 SUPERNVIDIAVSRX 7700AMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4080 SUPER or GeForce MX250?+
RTX 4080 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce MX250 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4080 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4080 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4080 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 4080 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4080 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce MX250 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4080 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4080 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4080 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX250 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX250 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4080 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.