NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce 8600 GTS
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
8600 GTS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4080 outperforms 8600 GTS by 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+85%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce 8600 GTS: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS shows a 85% advantage for RTX 4080 in gaming performance, while 8600 GTS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7239
75100
74100
8813
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 4080 is the best overall choice
RTX 4080 leads in combined game performance. 8600 GTS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 4080 leads in the combined performance index
8600 GTS costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 15–20of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4080
129 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8600 GTS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
72Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
58Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
56Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
75
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a—
HDMIHDMI 2.1—
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 3—
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS48.74Better0.093
Power consumption320 W60 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR3
Power connector16 pin6 pin
Release date20222007
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$1199$79Better
Shader units / cores9728Better32
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 1x16
Clock speed2205 - 2505 MHzBetter675 MHz
Base clock2205 MHzBetter675 MHz
Boost clock2505 MHzBetter675 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6X512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency22,4 GHzBetter2 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth717 GB/sBetter32 GB/s
Power consumption320 W60 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter80 nm
Recommended PSU700 W250 WBetter
Length310 mm198 mmBetter
Die size379 mm²169 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 64 MBL2 0.03 MBBetter
Transistor count45900 millionBetter289 million
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 40808600 GTS
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
35 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
30 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
23 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4080297 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS197 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080209 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS138 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080162 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS74 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 408081 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS27 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4080192 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS127 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080165 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS109 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080118 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS54 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 408054 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS18 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4080242 FPSEstimated 80%8600 GTS160 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 4080156 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS104 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080146 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS67 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 4080119 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS39 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4080156 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS104 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080131 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS87 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4080105 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS48 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 408055 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GTS18 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRTX 408035 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS23 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408030 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 408023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS10 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 408013 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GTS5 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100723959%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100763379%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100763281%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008813149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007510029%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100792798%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100782894%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100763281%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1008124109%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100773185%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 3—
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
Process node5 nmBetter80 nm
Release date20222007
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count45900 millionBetter289 million
Die size379 mm²169 mm²Better
Shader units / cores9728Better32
Base clock2205 MHzBetter675 MHz
Boost clock2505 MHzBetter675 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 1x16
Length310 mm198 mmBetter
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU700 W250 WBetter
Power connector16 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1—
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 4080 and 8600 GTS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6X512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS48.74Better0.093
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4080 or 8600 GTS?+
RTX 4080 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8600 GTS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8600 GTS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8600 GTS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8600 GTS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.