NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4090 vs Intel Arc 130T
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4090 and Arc 130T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4090 outperforms Arc 130T by ~40% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+40%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4090 (~33%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4090
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider Arc 130T
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
8863
Graphics card ranking
Positions 8–13of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4090
131 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
88Better
63
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
70Better
52
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
67Better
49
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
65Better
47
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Upscaling
DisplayPort
HDMI
TFLOPS
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4090 and Arc 130T across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4090Arc 130T
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
365 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
252 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
188 FPS
—
4K Ultra
95 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4090365 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090252 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090188 FPSArc 130T—RTX 409095 FPSArc 130T—
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4090230 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090205 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090142 FPSArc 130T—RTX 409068 FPSArc 130T—
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4090284 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090194 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090172 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090131 FPSArc 130T—
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4090187 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090157 FPSArc 130T—RTX 4090126 FPSArc 130T—RTX 409074 FPSArc 130T—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100886333%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100896531%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100916336%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100650200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100936338%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100936338%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100916336%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100956341%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100926337%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.4Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3Intel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceXe-LPG
Process node5 nmNot publicly specified
Release date2022Q1'25
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count76300 millionNot publicly specified
Die size609 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores16384Better7 Xe cores
Base clock2235 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2520 MHzBetterUp to 2.2 GHz (depends on host processor)
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16Integrated into processor package
Length304 mmNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessTriple-slotNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSU850 WSystem dependent
Power connector16 pinNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1 FRL (OEM dependent)
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors44 (platform capability)
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (DisplayPort)
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR6XShared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR6XShared DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus384 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS82.58Not publicly specified
Other comparisons
RX 9070 XT 16 GBAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 21 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4090 or Arc 130T?+
RTX 4090 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4090 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4090 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4090 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4090 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4090 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4090 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4090 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4090 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.