NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4090 vs Radeon R5 230
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
R5 230
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4090 and R5 230 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4090 outperforms R5 230 by ~184% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+184%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4090 (~38%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4090
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider R5 230
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
8831
65100
39100
10043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 8–13of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4090
131 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
88Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
70Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
67Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
65
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Upscaling
DisplayPort
HDMI
TFLOPSBetter
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4090 and R5 230 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4090R5 230
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
365 FPS
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
252 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
188 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
95 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4090365 FPSR5 230155 FPSRTX 4090252 FPSR5 230109 FPSRTX 4090188 FPSR5 23058 FPSRTX 409095 FPSR5 23021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4090230 FPSR5 230100 FPSRTX 4090205 FPSR5 23086 FPSRTX 4090142 FPSR5 23042 FPSRTX 409068 FPSR5 23014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4090284 FPSR5 230126 FPSRTX 4090194 FPSR5 23082 FPSRTX 4090172 FPSR5 23052 FPSRTX 4090131 FPSR5 23031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4090187 FPSR5 23082 FPSRTX 4090157 FPSR5 23068 FPSRTX 4090126 FPSR5 23038 FPSRTX 409074 FPSR5 23014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100883196%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100893197%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100913491%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001004380%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006510042%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100933688%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100933688%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100913491%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100953886%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100923590%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingDLSS 3Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTeraScale 2
Process node5 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20222014
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count76300 millionBetter370 million
Die size609 mm²67 mm²Better
Shader units / cores16384Better160
Base clock2235 MHzBetter625 MHz
Boost clock2520 MHzBetter625 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length304 mm168 mmBetter
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU850 W200 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR6XBetter1 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6XDDR3
Memory bus384 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS82.58Better0.2
Other comparisons
Arc B580IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4090 or R5 230?+
RTX 4090 has the higher overall gaming score, while R5 230 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4090 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
R5 230 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4090 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4090 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
R5 230 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
R5 230 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4090 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.