GeForce RTX 5050 vs GeForce GT 730M

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5050 and GeForce GT 730M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5050 outperforms GeForce GT 730M by ~50% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+50%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5050 (~43%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 5050

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 730M

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4530
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
9054
Memory capacity
6843
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 57–62of 321
RTX 5050#59position in the GPU ranking
GeForce GT 730Mnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce GT 730M

105 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
42

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Length

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5050 and GeForce GT 730M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
211 FPS
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
149 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
110 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
33 FPS
21 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5050211 FPSGeForce GT 730M152 FPSRTX 5050149 FPSGeForce GT 730M107 FPSRTX 5050110 FPSGeForce GT 730M57 FPSRTX 505033 FPSGeForce GT 730M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5050136 FPSGeForce GT 730M98 FPSRTX 5050117 FPSGeForce GT 730M85 FPSRTX 505080 FPSGeForce GT 730M42 FPSRTX 505022 FPSGeForce GT 730M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5050172 FPSGeForce GT 730M124 FPSRTX 5050111 FPSGeForce GT 730M80 FPSRTX 505099 FPSGeForce GT 730M52 FPSRTX 505048 FPSGeForce GT 730M30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5050111 FPSGeForce GT 730M80 FPSRTX 505093 FPSGeForce GT 730M67 FPSRTX 505071 FPSGeForce GT 730M37 FPSRTX 505022 FPSGeForce GT 730M14 FPS
Average FPSRTX 5050158 FPSGeForce GT 730M114 FPSRTX 5050118 FPSGeForce GT 730M85 FPSRTX 505090 FPSGeForce GT 730M47 FPSRTX 505031 FPSGeForce GT 730M20 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 5050GeForce GT 730MDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453040%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100553156%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 5050GeForce GT 730MDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100553642%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543543%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100583744%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523442%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Kepler / Fermi
Process node5 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20252014
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
Transistor count16900 millionBetter1020 million
Die size149 mm²87 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better384
Base clock2317 MHzBetter719 MHz
Boost clock2572 MHzBetter758 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
InterfacePCIe 5x8PCIe 2.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotMXM Module
Recommended PSU300 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 5050GeForce GT 730M
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS13.17Better0.582

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 505060
Device BGeForce GT 730M42
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 69

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (3)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (2)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5050 or GeForce GT 730M?

RTX 5050 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5050 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5050 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5050 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 5050 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5050 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5050 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 5050 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 5050 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5050 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 5050 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GeForce GT 730M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GeForce GT 730M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 5050 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.