H2H

GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce 8300 GS

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5060 and 8300 GS across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5060 outperforms 8300 GS by 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+44%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 5060 vs GeForce 8300 GS: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 5060 and 8300 GS shows a 44% advantage for RTX 5060 in gaming performance, while 8300 GS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5236
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
95100
Memory capacity
684
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 5060 is the best overall choice

RTX 5060 leads in combined game performance. 8300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE13%

RTX 5060 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$392

8300 GS costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 18–23of 319
RTX 5060#20position in the GPU ranking
8300 GSnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8300 GS

132 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8300 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 50608300 GS
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
52Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
44Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 50608300 GS
ArchitectureBlackwellTesla
Device classDesktopDesktop
Release date20252007
Shader units / cores3840Better8
TFLOPS19.2Better0.015
Base clock2280 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter459 MHz
Clock speed2280 - 2500 MHzBetter459 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR7128 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR7DDR2
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
Memory frequency28 Gbps800 MHzBetter
Power consumption145 W40 WBetter
Power consumption145 W40 WBetter
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector8 pin or PCIe Gen 5None
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 2x16
DirectX12 Ultimate10.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
Compute APICUDA 12.0, OpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bBoard dependent
HDMIHDMI 2.1bBoard dependent
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 x 43202560 × 1600
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Launch price$299$79Better
ThicknessSingle-slot
LengthVaries by board
Process node80 nm
Die size127 mm²
Memory cacheL2 0.02 MB
Transistor count210 million
USB Type-CNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 50608300 GS
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 50608300 GS171 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS120 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS74 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 50608300 GS28 FPSEstimated 64%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 50608300 GS111 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS95 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS54 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 50608300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 50608300 GS139 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 50608300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS67 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 50608300 GS41 FPSEstimated 64%
God of War RagnarökRTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 50608300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS76 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 50608300 GS48 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 50608300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
StarfieldRTX 50608300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 50608300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 50608300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Average FPSRTX 50608300 GS63 FPSRTX 50608300 GS48 FPSRTX 50608300 GS30 FPSRTX 50608300 GS14 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 50608300 GSDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100523636%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100592871%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100572771%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684178%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 50608300 GSDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100592195%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100592388%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100572771%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1006118109%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100572675%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
DirectX12 Ultimate10.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APICUDA 12.0, OpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
ArchitectureBlackwellTesla
Process node80 nm
Release date20252007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
Transistor count210 million
Die size127 mm²
Shader units / cores3840Better8
Base clock2280 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter459 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board
ThicknessSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector8 pin or PCIe Gen 5None

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
HDMIHDMI 2.1bBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bBoard dependent
USB Type-CNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 x 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 5060 and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50608300 GS
VRAM8 GB GDDR7128 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR7DDR2
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS19.2Better0.015
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 506068
Device B8300 GS60
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5060 or 8300 GS?

RTX 5060 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5060 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5060 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 5060 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5060 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5060 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 5060 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5060 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 5060 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 5060 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.