H2H

GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce 8500 GT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5070 and 8500 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5070 outperforms 8500 GT by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+51%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce 8500 GT: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 5070 and 8500 GT shows a 51% advantage for RTX 5070 in gaming performance, while 8500 GT may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6241
Efficiency
83100
Price / performance
81100
Memory capacity
807
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 5070 is the best overall choice

RTX 5070 leads in combined game performance. 8500 GT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE11%

RTX 5070 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$575

8500 GT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 31–36of 317
RTX 5070#33position in the GPU ranking
8500 GT#62position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8500 GT

157 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8500 GT

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 50708500 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
63
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 50708500 GT
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1b
HDMIHDMI 2.1b
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS30.87Better0.029
Power consumption250 W30 WBetter
Base clock2325 MHzBetter459 MHz
Memory typeGDDR7DDR2
Power connector16 pinNone
Release date20252007
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Tesla
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$549$79Better
Shader units / cores6144Better16
Clock speed2325 - 2512 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2512 MHzBetter459 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR7256 MB DDR2Better
Memory frequency28 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth672 GB/s12800 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 1x16
Power consumption250 W30 WBetter
Process node4 nmBetter80 nm
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Length245 mm229 mmBetter
Die size263 mm²127 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 48 MBL2 0.03 MBBetter
Transistor count31100 millionBetter210 million
UpscalingDLSS 4
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 50708500 GT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
30 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 65%
1080p Ultra
26 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 65%
1440p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 57%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5070255 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT196 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070179 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT138 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070139 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT87 FPSEstimated 69%RTX 507069 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT33 FPSEstimated 65%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5070165 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT127 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070142 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT109 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070101 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT63 FPSEstimated 69%RTX 507046 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT22 FPSEstimated 65%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5070208 FPSEstimated 80%8500 GT160 FPSEstimated 79%RTX 5070134 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT103 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070125 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT79 FPSEstimated 69%RTX 5070101 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT48 FPSEstimated 65%
God of War RagnarökRTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5070134 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT103 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 5070112 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT86 FPSEstimated 73%RTX 507090 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT57 FPSEstimated 69%RTX 507047 FPSEstimated 74%8500 GT22 FPSEstimated 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
StarfieldRTX 507030 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT23 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507026 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT20 FPSEstimated 65%RTX 507019 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT12 FPSEstimated 61%RTX 507011 FPSEstimated 66%8500 GT5 FPSEstimated 57%
Average FPSRTX 507094 FPS8500 GT72 FPSRTX 507072 FPS8500 GT56 FPSRTX 507057 FPS8500 GT36 FPSRTX 507033 FPS8500 GT16 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 50708500 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100624141%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100673173%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100807168%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 50708500 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100702692%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100692788%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100673173%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007222106%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100673173%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 4
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Tesla
Process node4 nmBetter80 nm
Release date20252007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
Transistor count31100 millionBetter210 million
Die size263 mm²127 mm²Better
Shader units / cores6144Better16
Base clock2325 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2512 MHzBetter459 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 1x16
Length245 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU600 W200 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
HDMIHDMI 2.1b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1b
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 5070 and 8500 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 50708500 GT
VRAM12 GB GDDR7256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR7DDR2
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS30.87Better0.029
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 507070
Device B8500 GT63
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5070 or 8500 GT?

RTX 5070 has the higher overall gaming score, while 8500 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 5070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8500 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 5070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 5070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8500 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8500 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 5070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.