NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5070 vs GeForce 9650M GT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 9650M GT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5070 and GeForce 9650M GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5070 outperforms GeForce 9650M GT by ~107% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+107%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5070 (~52%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5070
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider GeForce 9650M GT
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6230
83100
7154
8043
Graphics card ranking
Positions 43–48of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9650M GT
158 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Base clockBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5070 and GeForce 9650M GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5070GeForce 9650M GT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
255 FPS
150 FPS
1080p Ultra
179 FPS
106 FPS
1440p Ultra
139 FPS
57 FPS
4K Ultra
69 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5070255 FPSGeForce 9650M GT150 FPSRTX 5070179 FPSGeForce 9650M GT106 FPSRTX 5070139 FPSGeForce 9650M GT57 FPSRTX 507069 FPSGeForce 9650M GT20 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5070165 FPSGeForce 9650M GT97 FPSRTX 5070142 FPSGeForce 9650M GT84 FPSRTX 5070101 FPSGeForce 9650M GT41 FPSRTX 507046 FPSGeForce 9650M GT14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5070208 FPSGeForce 9650M GT123 FPSRTX 5070134 FPSGeForce 9650M GT79 FPSRTX 5070125 FPSGeForce 9650M GT51 FPSRTX 5070101 FPSGeForce 9650M GT30 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5070134 FPSGeForce 9650M GT79 FPSRTX 5070112 FPSGeForce 9650M GT66 FPSRTX 507090 FPSGeForce 9650M GT37 FPSRTX 507047 FPSGeForce 9650M GT14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100623070%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683078%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100673465%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100804360%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100703664%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100693565%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100673465%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100723764%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100673465%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Tesla
Process node4 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20252008
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count31100 millionBetter314 million
Die size263 mm²121 mm²Better
Shader units / cores6144Better32
Base clock2325 MHzBetter550 MHz
Boost clock2512 MHzBetter550 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16MXM-II
Length245 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotMXM Module
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR7Better1 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus192 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS30.87Better0.085
Other comparisons
Arc A770IntelVS
RTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4070 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3060 Ti GDDR6NVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4080NVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 5060 Ti 8GBNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5070 or GeForce 9650M GT?+
RTX 5070 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5070 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 5070 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 9650M GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 9650M GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.