NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Quadro NVS 310
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 310
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5070 and Quadro NVS 310 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5070 outperforms Quadro NVS 310 by ~12% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+12%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5070 (~12%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5070
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider Quadro NVS 310
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6239
83100
71100
8013
Graphics card ranking
Positions 43–48of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Quadro NVS 310
178 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Quadro NVS 310
Price $65.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
57
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Base clockBetter
Memory type
Power connector—
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API—
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5070 and Quadro NVS 310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5070Quadro NVS 310
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
255 FPS
197 FPS
1080p Ultra
179 FPS
138 FPS
1440p Ultra
139 FPS
74 FPS
4K Ultra
69 FPS
27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5070255 FPSQuadro NVS 310197 FPSRTX 5070179 FPSQuadro NVS 310138 FPSRTX 5070139 FPSQuadro NVS 31074 FPSRTX 507069 FPSQuadro NVS 31027 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5070165 FPSQuadro NVS 310127 FPSRTX 5070142 FPSQuadro NVS 310109 FPSRTX 5070101 FPSQuadro NVS 31054 FPSRTX 507046 FPSQuadro NVS 31018 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5070208 FPSQuadro NVS 310160 FPSRTX 5070134 FPSQuadro NVS 310104 FPSRTX 5070125 FPSQuadro NVS 31067 FPSRTX 5070101 FPSQuadro NVS 31039 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5070134 FPSQuadro NVS 310104 FPSRTX 5070112 FPSQuadro NVS 31087 FPSRTX 507090 FPSQuadro NVS 31048 FPSRTX 507047 FPSQuadro NVS 31018 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100623946%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008013144%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100702789%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100692885%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007224100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100673173%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0—
Architecture and release
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Not publicly specified
Process node4 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20252012
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count31100 millionNot publicly specified
Die size263 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores6144Not publicly specified
Base clock2325 MHzBetter523 MHz
Boost clock2512 MHzBetter523 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 2x16
Length245 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU600 WVaries by board
Power connector16 pin—
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bBoard dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR7512 MB DDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR7DDR3
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS30.87Better0.05
Other comparisons
Arc A770IntelVS
RTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4070 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 3060 Ti GDDR6NVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 4080NVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 5060 Ti 8GBNVIDIAVSRTX 5070NVIDIAOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5070 or Quadro NVS 310?+
RTX 5070 has the higher overall gaming score, while Quadro NVS 310 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Quadro NVS 310 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Quadro NVS 310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Quadro NVS 310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.