NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs GeForce Go 6600
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce Go 6600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5080 SUPER and GeForce Go 6600 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 5080 SUPER outperforms GeForce Go 6600 by ~179% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+179%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (~138%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 5080 SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4
Reasons to consider GeForce Go 6600
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
7828
9564
1007
Graphics card ranking
Positions 2–7of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
131 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
78Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
63Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
60Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
32
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release status—
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Thickness
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power consumption—
TFLOPS
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 SUPER and GeForce Go 6600 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 5080 SUPERGeForce Go 6600
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
326 FPS
143 FPS
1080p Ultra
226 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
169 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
85 FPS
19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5080 SUPER326 FPSGeForce Go 6600143 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER226 FPSGeForce Go 6600101 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER169 FPSGeForce Go 660054 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER85 FPSGeForce Go 660019 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5080 SUPER206 FPSGeForce Go 660092 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER184 FPSGeForce Go 660080 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER128 FPSGeForce Go 660039 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER61 FPSGeForce Go 660013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5080 SUPER254 FPSGeForce Go 6600117 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER174 FPSGeForce Go 660075 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER154 FPSGeForce Go 660049 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER117 FPSGeForce Go 660029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5080 SUPER168 FPSGeForce Go 660075 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER141 FPSGeForce Go 660063 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER112 FPSGeForce Go 660035 FPSRTX 5080 SUPER66 FPSGeForce Go 660013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100782894%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 1008322116%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1008422117%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001007174%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100630200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 1008819129%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 1008720125%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 1008422117%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1009016140%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 1008522118%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.29.3
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.62.0
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0CUDA / OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedCurie
Process node4 nmBetter110 nm
Release date20262005
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified146 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified154 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Base clock2295 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter300 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16MXM-II
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardMXM Module
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors1OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GB GDDR7Better0.25 GB DDR
Memory typeGDDR7DDR / DDR2
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS65Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 SUPER or GeForce Go 6600?+
RTX 5080 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5080 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 5080 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 5080 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 5080 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.