GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs Radeon 840M

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5080 SUPER and Radeon 840M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 840M outperforms RTX 5080 SUPER by ~6% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+6%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER (~12%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 5080 SUPER

  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4

Reasons to consider Radeon 840M

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • Recorded feature support: Not publicly specified · AMD FSR
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Performance
7883
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 2–7of 321
RTX 5080 SUPER#4position in the GPU ranking
Radeon 840Mnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

131 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
78
83Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
63
66Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
60
64Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63Better
61
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
68

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
Release status
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Thickness
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power consumption
TFLOPS
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 SUPER and Radeon 840M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
326 FPS
1080p Ultra
226 FPS
1440p Ultra
169 FPS
4K Ultra
85 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5080 SUPER326 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER226 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER169 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER85 FPSRadeon 840M
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5080 SUPER206 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER184 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER128 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER61 FPSRadeon 840M
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5080 SUPER254 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER174 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER154 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER117 FPSRadeon 840M
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5080 SUPER168 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER141 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER112 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER66 FPSRadeon 840M
Average FPSRTX 5080 SUPER239 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER181 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER141 FPSRadeon 840MRTX 5080 SUPER82 FPSRadeon 840M

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840MDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10078836%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10083852%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10084831%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100630200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840MDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10088836%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10087835%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10084831%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10090838%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10085832%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
DirectX12.212
Vulkan1.4Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.6Not publicly specified
UpscalingDLSS 4AMD FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0Not publicly specified

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 3.5
Process node4 nm4 nm
Release date20262025
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified4 Compute Units
Base clock2295 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2617 MHzUp to 2900 MHz (depends on host processor)Better

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
InterfacePCIe 5x16Integrated into processor package
LengthVaries by boardNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessVaries by boardNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSUVaries by boardSystem dependent
Power connector16 pinNot applicable (integrated GPU)

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
HDMIHDMI 2.1bHDMI 2.1 (OEM dependent)
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bDisplayPort 2.1 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-CNoDisplayPort Alt Mode supported; OEM dependent
Max monitors14 (platform capability)
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320 @ 60 Hz (DisplayPort)

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 5080 SUPERRadeon 840M
VRAM24 GB GDDR7Shared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR7Shared DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus256 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS65Not publicly specified

Other comparisons

0

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 5080 SUPER76
Device BRadeon 840M68
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
16
Specifications
18 / 68

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (2)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (1)
  1. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 SUPER or Radeon 840M?

RTX 5080 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5080 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5080 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5080 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 5080 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5080 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 5080 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 5080 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 5080 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RTX 5080 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RTX 5080 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.