GeForce RTX 5080 vs GeForce GTS 150M

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5080 and GeForce GTS 150M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5080 outperforms GeForce GTS 150M by ~153% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+153%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 5080 (~60%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 5080

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0 · DLSS 4

Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 150M

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
7630
Efficiency
63100
Price / performance
5454
Memory capacity
8843
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 28–33of 321
RTX 5080#30position in the GPU ranking
GeForce GTS 150Mnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 5080

154 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
42

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price
Shader units / coresBetter
Length
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 5080 and GeForce GTS 150M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
316 FPS
147 FPS
1080p Ultra
222 FPS
104 FPS
1440p Ultra
173 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
86 FPS
22 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 5080316 FPSGeForce GTS 150M147 FPSRTX 5080222 FPSGeForce GTS 150M104 FPSRTX 5080173 FPSGeForce GTS 150M58 FPSRTX 508086 FPSGeForce GTS 150M22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 5080204 FPSGeForce GTS 150M95 FPSRTX 5080176 FPSGeForce GTS 150M82 FPSRTX 5080125 FPSGeForce GTS 150M42 FPSRTX 508058 FPSGeForce GTS 150M15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 5080234 FPSGeForce GTS 150M120 FPSRTX 5080167 FPSGeForce GTS 150M78 FPSRTX 5080155 FPSGeForce GTS 150M52 FPSRTX 5080126 FPSGeForce GTS 150M32 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 5080167 FPSGeForce GTS 150M78 FPSRTX 5080139 FPSGeForce GTS 150M65 FPSRTX 5080112 FPSGeForce GTS 150M38 FPSRTX 508059 FPSGeForce GTS 150M15 FPS
Average FPSRTX 5080230 FPSGeForce GTS 150M110 FPSRTX 5080176 FPSGeForce GTS 150M82 FPSRTX 5080141 FPSGeForce GTS 150M48 FPSRTX 508082 FPSGeForce GTS 150M21 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150MDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100763087%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100792993%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100793480%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006310045%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150MDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100813677%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100813579%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100793480%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100833777%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100803481%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 4Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 12.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0Tesla
Process node4 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20252009
Device classDesktopMobile

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
Transistor count45600 millionBetter505 million
Die size378 mm²240 mm²Better
Shader units / cores10752Better64
Base clock2295 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2617 MHzBetter400 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length304 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU750 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
HDMIHDMI 2.1bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1bOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 5080GeForce GTS 150M
VRAM16 GB GDDR7Better1 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR7GDDR3 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS56.28Better0.128

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 508067
Device BGeForce GTS 150M42
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 69

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (4)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (2)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 5080 or GeForce GTS 150M?

RTX 5080 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 5080 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 5080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 5080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 5080 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 5080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 5080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GeForce GTS 150M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GeForce GTS 150M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 5080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.